Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Opto / relay recommendation
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2002-05-30 17:12:04 UTC
In a message dated 30-May-02 17:33:54 Central Daylight Time, rab@...
writes:
about 2.4 to 5 VDC. Others (ULN2004) are for "12 V CMOS levels", say, 10 to
15 V input. I do not have the "specs" at hand, but that's close.
Another - the ULN2001, if I'm not mistaken? - has NO "base resistors", just
the Darlingtons and rev. EMF diodes. With that one, you have to "do your OWN
base-resistors "outside" the DIP.
It is only the INPUTS that differ in these "ULN200n" series. The "last
digit" denotes the kind of INPUT to the bases of the 7 Darlingtons.
I think someone said try the T.I. (Texas Instrument) site, and look up the
data-sheets for the ULN- series. I never did that, but I have done other
similar stuff, so it shouldn't be difficult at all. It is mind-bending what
DATA one can find on-line! GO for it!
Lotsa luck! Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
writes:
> There seem to be a few ICs with the same or seemingly very similarRab: Some (ULN2003) are for "TTL level input" (they work with an input of
> specs under the ULN2003 code (and the codes Larry mentioned) I'm not
> sure I understand the differences, should they all work for this kind
> of task anyhow ?
about 2.4 to 5 VDC. Others (ULN2004) are for "12 V CMOS levels", say, 10 to
15 V input. I do not have the "specs" at hand, but that's close.
Another - the ULN2001, if I'm not mistaken? - has NO "base resistors", just
the Darlingtons and rev. EMF diodes. With that one, you have to "do your OWN
base-resistors "outside" the DIP.
It is only the INPUTS that differ in these "ULN200n" series. The "last
digit" denotes the kind of INPUT to the bases of the 7 Darlingtons.
I think someone said try the T.I. (Texas Instrument) site, and look up the
data-sheets for the ULN- series. I never did that, but I have done other
similar stuff, so it shouldn't be difficult at all. It is mind-bending what
DATA one can find on-line! GO for it!
Lotsa luck! Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
rainnea
2002-05-30 05:32:14 UTC
Opto / relay recommendation
Larry Van Duyn
2002-05-30 05:48:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Opto / relay recommendation
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-05-30 12:54:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Opto / relay recommendation
rainnea
2002-05-30 15:10:11 UTC
Re: Opto / relay recommendation
JanRwl@A...
2002-05-30 15:10:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Opto / relay recommendation
rainnea
2002-05-30 15:13:43 UTC
Re: Opto / relay recommendation
Larry Van Duyn
2002-05-30 15:22:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Opto / relay recommendation
Nic van der Walt
2002-05-30 15:29:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Opto / relay recommendation
rainnea
2002-05-30 15:31:26 UTC
Re: Opto / relay recommendation
rainnea
2002-05-30 16:02:31 UTC
Re: Opto / relay recommendation
JanRwl@A...
2002-05-30 17:02:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Opto / relay recommendation
JanRwl@A...
2002-05-30 17:12:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Opto / relay recommendation
Eric Keller
2002-05-30 17:14:33 UTC
Opto / relay recommendation
Steve Blackmore
2002-05-31 02:06:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Opto / relay recommendation
Mark Taft
2002-05-31 02:52:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Opto / relay recommendation
JanRwl@A...
2002-05-31 14:46:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Opto / relay recommendation
rainnea
2002-05-31 15:25:40 UTC
Re: Opto / relay recommendation
Steve Blackmore
2002-05-31 16:45:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Opto / relay recommendation
JanRwl@A...
2002-05-31 17:06:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Opto / relay recommendation
rainnea
2002-06-01 03:54:59 UTC
Re: Opto / relay recommendation
rainnea
2002-06-01 04:04:39 UTC
Re: Opto / relay recommendation
JanRwl@A...
2002-06-01 11:32:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Opto / relay recommendation