CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates

Posted by rainnea
on 2002-08-04 14:31:54 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Dan Statman" <dan.statman@r...> wrote:
> Fred,
>
> Of course you are absolutely correct when taking into account true
4-axis
> 3-D work. But given the fact that low end controllers are not
handling the
> mixing of linear and rotary axes very well by using the linear axis
feedrate
> exclusively and then spinning the rotary axis at a value to keep
the move
> synchronous, which may be far in excess of a reasonable value,
don't you
> think it would make sense to limit the speed to the SLOWER of the
rotary
> feedrate or the linear feedrate.
>
> This obviously assumes that the feedrates are selected with
knowledge of the
> radius of the rotating part. By selecting the feedrates with this
> knowledge, I then do not have to have the control program know the
radius.
> and the only downside is that sometimes the part moves slower than I
> intended. This is not nearly as detrimental as moving faster than I
> expected. If it moves slower then the part takes longer, if it
moves faster
> the cutter breaks and the part is potentially ruined.
>
> Dan.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "imserv1" <imserv@v...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...>
> Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2002 9:10 AM
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question about angular and linear
feedrates
>
>
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Dan Statman" <dan.statman@r...>
wrote:
> > > The points you state are obviously correct in that the
controller
> > has no way
> > > of knowing the radius of the spinning part to determine a linear
> > feedrate
> > > based on the rotation feedrate. My contention is this,
wouldn't it
> > always
> > > be a better compromise if when the feedrate is set to 1.0 then
the
> > linear
> > > axis should never move faster than 1.0 ipm and the rotary axis
> > should never
> > > move faster than 1.0 degrees per second, and the non-limiting
axis
> > would be
> > > adjusted so that the move is synchronized.
> > >
> >
> > Think in 3D rather than cylindrical surface only. Ther is no
reason
> > that the controller cannot be aware of radius.
> >
> > Assume you have a rotary axis parallel to the X. This would be
> > termed an A axis. You can vary the Z, and A simultaneously.
Don't
> > change the X at all for this example.
> >
> > You command a series of Z-A movements (Z=0 at centerline of A
axis).
> >
> > Z1 A90
> > Z0 A180
> > Z1 A270
> > Z2 A360
> > Z1 A90
> >
> > This forms a 1/2 roundish kind of part. You might of course want
the
> > inner area to even be concave and the Z=0 at 180 might actually go
> > negative. If you apply a single feedrate in degrees per minute,
or
> > degrees per second, you will find that this contour in very
difficult
> > to cut, with slow cutting near the center and fast rotation near
the
> > outer diameter of the part.
> >
> > If you now add in some X movements as well, the problem is further
> > compounded, but you finally see the whole picture.
> >
> > The solution for rotary 4th axis contouring is for the controller
> > software to evaluate each movement as a series of linear
> > approximations and apply the programmed movement in inches per
> > minute, with a limit of the actual maximum feed rate possible on
any
> > of the 3 axes, including the effects of the radius, as defined by
the
> > Z height. While it's true that there is also a Y component
available,
> > there is no supported software that will actually utilize that
> > component in a low cost product(yet). Therefore if the 3 axes
were
> > processed in the controllers (X-Z-A), it would result in a very
> > usable solution for the hobbyist
> >
> > Things to watch out for:
> >
> > 1) Some controllers cannot make a straight X or Z movement when in
> > rotary mode as there are no degrees defined in the move block, and
> > they do not maintain a linear and a rotary feed rate.
> >
> > 2) Some controllers will only program the radius at one size. Any
> > significant Z movement off that predefined cylinder will create
> > wildly fluctuating real feed rates at the cut.
> >
> > 3) Some controllers will pick the slowest axis no matter what.
and
> > then do not compensate for Z variation if the rotary is the
slowest.
> >
> > 4) Some controllers cannot differentiate between linear and rotary
> > movement at all and require the user to scale his axis and feed
> > rates, and even though the rotary is a function of the Z height,
> > apply all feed rates linearly.
> >
> > I wrote a program that post processed 3D linear G-code into 3D
rotary
> > axis with proper feed rates in Degrees per minute(360.999) for the
> > entire envelope I have defined. The theoretical movements and
speeds
> > were correct, but none of the low end controllers were capable of
> > actually processing the data. (lack of 4th axis coordination,
poor or
> > no continuous contouring, etc) This was before EMC and it may
now be
> > possible to process the data correctly, particularly since EMC
pre-
> > processes the entire file, and with a quadrupling of processor
speed
> > since I wrote the program 4 years ago.
> >
> > Best Regards, Fred Smith- IMService
> >
> > Listserve Special discounts and offers are at:
> > http://www.imsrv.com/2002group.html
> >
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
reach it if
> you have trouble.
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
as a
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
POSTING THEM.
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> >
> > Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@y...
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@y...
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@y..., wanliker@a...
> > Moderator: jmelson@a... timg@k... [Moderator]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > bill,
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >

Discussion Thread

Dan Statman 2002-08-03 12:28:46 UTC Question about angular and linear feedrates Brian Pitt 2002-08-03 14:47:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question about angular and linear feedrates rainnea 2002-08-03 16:50:08 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Dan Statman 2002-08-03 16:51:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question about angular and linear feedrates Dan Statman 2002-08-03 17:58:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates bsptrades 2002-08-03 21:16:46 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates alenz2002 2002-08-03 21:24:03 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Dan Statman 2002-08-03 22:16:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Dan Statman 2002-08-03 22:26:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates imserv1 2002-08-04 06:11:01 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Dan Statman 2002-08-04 08:42:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates imserv1 2002-08-04 09:08:15 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Brian Pitt 2002-08-04 14:29:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates rainnea 2002-08-04 14:31:54 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-08-04 15:13:04 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Brian Pitt 2002-08-04 15:37:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates cadcambee 2002-08-04 17:02:04 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Jon Elson 2002-08-04 19:57:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question about angular and linear feedrates Jon Elson 2002-08-04 20:13:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates rainnea 2002-08-05 01:42:57 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Brian Pitt 2002-08-05 11:04:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-08-05 12:43:24 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates superintendent_god_botherer2000 2002-08-05 15:20:31 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates rainnea 2002-08-05 15:34:39 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Dan Statman 2002-08-05 15:41:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-08-05 16:14:59 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Brian Pitt 2002-08-05 21:14:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-08-06 10:45:26 UTC Re: Question about angular and linear feedrates