Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-09-24 20:10:24 UTC
cadcamcenter wrote:
But, the standard, I think, requires that several of the control and status lines
be on twisted pairs, but the data wires are NOT! For step/dir controls, though,
it is the data wires that NEED to be free of interference and crosstalk! So, an
IEEE-1284 cable may not be the best choice for this. I have found that I MUST
use IEEE-1284 cables for my devices that use the IEEE-1284 protocol for
communication with the PC. A standard printer cable messes up all the signals
with crosstalk.
Jon
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Alan Marconett KM6VV <KM6VV@a...> wrote:Yes, and as far as printers, scanners, and other similar devices, that is fine.
>
> > I'd also recommend using a DB25 male connector on your "driver/PS
> box",
> > and a STANDARD cable ("1284", i.e., best printer cable you can
> buy).
>
> What is the difference between an IEEE-1284 cable and a standard one?
>
> extract from:
> http://www.pccables.com/cables/printer_cables.html
>
> What is the difference between an IEEE-1284 cable and a standard one?
> This is often a misunderstood concept. First, let's make the
> distinction between bidirectional and 1284-compliant cables. Applying
> the 1284 standard to cables, the IEEE-compliance primarily means
> speed, and these cables are precisely manufactured for that purpose.
> The 1284 standard sets exacting specifications on cable impedance,
> shielding, length, and connector styles to insure that they will be
> up to the task. Bidirectional cables must simply be able to transfer
> data in both directions, and your everyday 25-wire printer cables
> (and all straight-thru 25 wire cables) are capable of this; they are
> not, however, capable of the speed required by 1284-compliant
> peripherals. Peripherals which are IEEE-1284 compliant (such as many
> newer printers) require the use of a high-speed cable, as do most of
> the devices that connect to an EPP or ECP
But, the standard, I think, requires that several of the control and status lines
be on twisted pairs, but the data wires are NOT! For step/dir controls, though,
it is the data wires that NEED to be free of interference and crosstalk! So, an
IEEE-1284 cable may not be the best choice for this. I have found that I MUST
use IEEE-1284 cables for my devices that use the IEEE-1284 protocol for
communication with the PC. A standard printer cable messes up all the signals
with crosstalk.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Kayla Sanders
2002-09-24 12:23:51 UTC
cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
caudlet
2002-09-24 15:03:37 UTC
Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Tim Goldstein
2002-09-24 15:11:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Kayla Sanders
2002-09-24 16:00:41 UTC
Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-09-24 16:29:59 UTC
Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
cadcamcenter
2002-09-24 17:28:53 UTC
Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Marv Frankel
2002-09-24 18:30:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Jerry Kimberlin
2002-09-24 18:42:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Jon Elson
2002-09-24 19:49:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Jon Elson
2002-09-24 19:56:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Tim Goldstein
2002-09-24 20:03:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Jon Elson
2002-09-24 20:04:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Jon Elson
2002-09-24 20:10:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Mark
2002-09-24 20:51:15 UTC
Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
dazedNconfused
2002-09-24 21:12:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Mark
2002-09-24 21:19:48 UTC
Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????
Marv Frankel
2002-09-25 06:07:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cable from PC to stepper drivers?????