Re: Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-02-01 23:52:04 UTC
James Eckman wrote:
about 4 years in St. Louis, and
the 'Network Interface Unit' on the outside wall of the house has had
it's supressor blown out
at least once since I put mine in. (Of course, the Phone company's unit
gets to handle as much
of the surge as it can, FIRST!)
<snip>
working on a circuit
to start a mercury-arc lamp, with a 20 KV supply and a spark gap. I
wanted to limit
the peak current, but a 100 Ohm 2W film resistor blew apart, telling me
that my peak
current (especially without the resistor) was quite high.
Jon
>Well, I can say that my setup, with the film resistors, has survived
> > I don't believe this is correct. carbon comps, all but extinct now,
> have a
> > solid block of carbon composition encapsulated in some plastics
> material.
> > When they fail they short and burn.
>
> They are pretty obsolete nowadays. However, in this application they
> have a tendency to stay together and will pass dozens of simulated
> part
> 15 lightning strikes. It will also pass at least a couple of real
> ones.
> Carbon films have a tendency to arc over and open up. Nothing wrong
> with
> that so long as you don't mind replacing them.
about 4 years in St. Louis, and
the 'Network Interface Unit' on the outside wall of the house has had
it's supressor blown out
at least once since I put mine in. (Of course, the Phone company's unit
gets to handle as much
of the surge as it can, FIRST!)
<snip>
> True, but instead hook them up to a lightning simulator, or fieldWell, I discovered this 'feature' of the film resistors when I was
> trial
> them in Colorado or parts of Texas for two years ;)
working on a circuit
to start a mercury-arc lamp, with a 20 KV supply and a spark gap. I
wanted to limit
the peak current, but a 100 Ohm 2W film resistor blew apart, telling me
that my peak
current (especially without the resistor) was quite high.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Harrison, Doug
2000-01-31 17:58:54 UTC
Optoisolation for a modem
hansw
2000-01-31 19:07:32 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Bertho Boman
2000-01-31 20:20:00 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
George Potter
2000-01-31 22:13:32 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Jon Elson
2000-01-31 22:32:09 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Rich Dean
2000-01-31 23:07:24 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
James Eckman
2000-02-01 07:40:24 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Jim Fackert
2000-02-01 09:52:58 UTC
Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Harrison, Doug
2000-02-01 10:16:57 UTC
RE: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Jon Elson
2000-02-01 14:00:35 UTC
Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Bertho Boman
2000-02-01 14:12:22 UTC
Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
James Eckman
2000-02-01 20:01:25 UTC
Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Jim Fackert
2000-02-01 20:45:50 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
George Potter
2000-02-01 21:43:19 UTC
Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Jon Elson
2000-02-01 23:52:04 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Jon Elson
2000-02-01 23:58:19 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Frank Pierson
2000-02-02 07:16:01 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
James Eckman
2000-02-02 07:30:41 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem