Re: Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-02-01 23:58:19 UTC
Jim Fackert wrote:
1000 V or higher spike! I DO
want them to open up, like fuses, and quickly! I'd use a higher value,
but it will start to affect the
line characteristics.
68 says that the
phone must not go up in flames, eject fragments beyond the housing,
etc. The phone
does NOT have to work after these tests! And, the pictures I've seen
tell me, THEY
DON'T! They get fried, good.
Jon
> From: "Jim Fackert" <jfackert@...>No, I don't think a 10 Ohm resistor is enough to limit the current of a
>
> So the impedance of the resistors is adequate, with the strike shorted
> to
> ground, to limit the voltage and protect the parts, adn you DON'T
> want them
> to open up like fuses!
1000 V or higher spike! I DO
want them to open up, like fuses, and quickly! I'd use a higher value,
but it will start to affect the
line characteristics.
>I'm not worried about part 68 compliance, this is in my own home. Part
> James wrote
> >in this application carbon comps
> > have a tendency to stay together and will pass dozens of simulated
> part
> > 15 lightning strikes. It will also pass at least a couple of real
> ones.
> > Carbon films have a tendency to arc over and open up. Nothing wrong
> with
> > that so long as you don't mind replacing them.
68 says that the
phone must not go up in flames, eject fragments beyond the housing,
etc. The phone
does NOT have to work after these tests! And, the pictures I've seen
tell me, THEY
DON'T! They get fried, good.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Harrison, Doug
2000-01-31 17:58:54 UTC
Optoisolation for a modem
hansw
2000-01-31 19:07:32 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Bertho Boman
2000-01-31 20:20:00 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
George Potter
2000-01-31 22:13:32 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Jon Elson
2000-01-31 22:32:09 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Rich Dean
2000-01-31 23:07:24 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
James Eckman
2000-02-01 07:40:24 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Jim Fackert
2000-02-01 09:52:58 UTC
Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Harrison, Doug
2000-02-01 10:16:57 UTC
RE: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Jon Elson
2000-02-01 14:00:35 UTC
Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Bertho Boman
2000-02-01 14:12:22 UTC
Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
James Eckman
2000-02-01 20:01:25 UTC
Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Jim Fackert
2000-02-01 20:45:50 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
George Potter
2000-02-01 21:43:19 UTC
Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Jon Elson
2000-02-01 23:52:04 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Jon Elson
2000-02-01 23:58:19 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem
Frank Pierson
2000-02-02 07:16:01 UTC
Re: Optoisolation for a modem
James Eckman
2000-02-02 07:30:41 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Optoisolation for a modem