CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Mach1 w/ toolchanger? Yes. was Re: Measuring backlash more accurately?

on 2003-02-27 16:30:45 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Art <fenerty@h...> wrote:
> Jon:
>
> > do! Any hope that Mach2 will allow closed-loop operation, ie.
encoder
> > feedback?
> >
>
> Mach1 allows for reading the encoders. Mach2 will extend that to
closed
> loop correction in the future. This will take little while though
as the
> lathe functions, syncronised movement and spindle postion feedback
are the
> first to be added after Mach2 goes to beta stage in about 3 weeks.
> Also the encoders will be used as a full function DRO to allow
for manual


Don't forget about Torch Height Control too! To all the guys
building plasma tables and needing an affordable THC solution MACH2
can be the answer. Remember....you PROMISED!!

Discussion Thread

Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2003-02-16 13:46:56 UTC Measuring backlash more accurately? Jon Elson 2003-02-16 15:45:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Measuring backlash more accurately? Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2003-02-16 17:24:11 UTC Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? torsten98001 <torsten@g... 2003-02-16 18:16:29 UTC Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Jon Elson 2003-02-16 21:26:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2003-02-16 23:27:34 UTC Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2003-02-16 23:35:01 UTC Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? torsten98001 <torsten@g... 2003-02-17 03:59:26 UTC Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Hoyt McKagen 2003-02-17 04:29:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Measuring backlash more accurately? Jon Elson 2003-02-17 06:59:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2003-02-18 16:25:04 UTC Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? justjuha <juha.keisala@n... 2003-02-19 02:15:16 UTC Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Jon Elson 2003-02-19 10:42:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Bob Simon 2003-02-19 16:28:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? ballendo <ballendo@y... 2003-02-20 04:48:23 UTC axis clamping was Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? ballendo <ballendo@y... 2003-02-20 06:18:30 UTC axis clamps/brakes was Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Fred Smith <imserv@v... 2003-02-20 06:32:09 UTC axis clamping was Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Jon Elson 2003-02-20 10:41:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] axis clamps/brakes was Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? ballendo <ballendo@y... 2003-02-21 03:33:22 UTC axis clamps/brakes was Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Jon Elson 2003-02-21 09:54:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] axis clamps/brakes was Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? justjuha <juha.keisala@n... 2003-02-24 03:19:36 UTC Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Jon Elson 2003-02-24 10:10:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Bob Simon 2003-02-24 12:03:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? ballendo <ballendo@y... 2003-02-26 10:36:06 UTC Mach1 w/ toolchanger? Yes. was Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Jon Elson 2003-02-26 22:52:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mach1 w/ toolchanger? Yes. was Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? Art 2003-02-27 10:21:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mach1 w/ toolchanger? Yes. was Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? caudlet <info@t... 2003-02-27 16:30:45 UTC Mach1 w/ toolchanger? Yes. was Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? justjuha <juha.keisala@n... 2003-02-28 01:17:30 UTC Mach1 w/ toolchanger? Yes. was Re: Measuring backlash more accurately? ballendo <ballendo@y... 2003-03-04 05:59:48 UTC Mach1 closed loop? sortof-NOW was Mach1 w/ toolchanger? Yes.