removing backlash from rack/pinion drives wasRe: Shoptask Z-axis - quadralift?
Posted by
ballendo
on 2003-03-06 00:24:40 UTC
Bill,
Never seen that approach. But...
What is typically done is similar. The GEAR is split (or two narrow
gears are used if you prefer<G>) and these two "halves" are sping
loaded (rotationally) against each other. You can see examples in the
stock drive products catalog, which is available free.
A 2.5 axis cnc machine would make short work of making these from a
couple of stock gears. A manual mill and a rotary table wouldn't be
too far behind...
Hope this helps,
Ballendo
Never seen that approach. But...
What is typically done is similar. The GEAR is split (or two narrow
gears are used if you prefer<G>) and these two "halves" are sping
loaded (rotationally) against each other. You can see examples in the
stock drive products catalog, which is available free.
A 2.5 axis cnc machine would make short work of making these from a
couple of stock gears. A manual mill and a rotary table wouldn't be
too far behind...
Hope this helps,
Ballendo
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, ccq@x wrote:
> Hi guys;
>
> Maybe someones tried this before, and can tell us if it'd work. It
might
> require a wider than usual gear/rack, but what if you took a
slitting saw, and
> slit the rack right down the middle. lock one half down as usual,
and then
> slide the other half lengthwise, one direction or the other, until
all the slop
> is taken out. Would this be workable, or just engender extreme
wear, or
> sosmething?
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Wed Mar 5 16:20:44 2003 alan@s... wrote:
>
> >On 5 Mar, CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> >
> >> This is addressed to those who have CNC'd Shoptask machines.
> >
> >This is an interesting question that I am currently struggling with
> >myself.
> >
> >I do have a CNC'd Shoptask.
> >
> >I do not have a Quadralift, but I am certainly going to add
SOMETHING
> >to raise and lower the mill head, for reasons that need no
explanation
> >to anyone else with a 3in1.
> >
> > Frankly, as I examine pictures of the QL, I'm pretty sure that a
guy
> > could make one himself, of at least the same quality, and do it
all on
> > the Shoptask.
> >
> >The question then becomes "why use the quill at all ?"
> >
> >You see, I don't agree that the quill is necessarily more
accurate. I
> >have taken great pains to take all the play that I can out of the
quill
> >(removing the "drill press mode" by pinning the gear, using thrust
> >washers on both ends on the fine feed shaft with adjustable
preload,
> >etc) and I still get the inevitable play as a result of the lash
> >between the gear and the rack cut into the quill.
> >
> >The issue is easily seen. Bring the quill down until it just
touches
> >the work. Now try to turn the crank some more. You should not be
able
> >to .. you're touching the work, right ? But you CAN turn it some
more
> >... you're taking up the lash in the above mentioned gear train.
> >
> >Now the REAL question .. is the above seen lash constant
throughout the
> >travel of the quill ? Not on mine, and likely not on yours .. the
rack
> >is just not machined accurately enough.
> >
> >Even if it is, you're left with "zeroing" the work, by what ever
means
> >usually taken ( rice paper, edge finder, etc ), then adding in the
lash
> >you know is there and hope your chosen offset is correct.
> >
> >There's a good reason why Chuck McGhee's ball screw quill upgrade
is so
> >popular.
> >
> >So here's the thoughts kicking around my brain on this topic.
> >
> >Since I need SOME sort of screw to move the mill head up and down
on my
> >homebrew QL, why not make it a QUALITY acme screw with QUALITY
> >doublenuts.
> >
> >Make sure the QL goes up and down with REALLY good registration.
> >Thomson linear slides is my current scheme, but there are other
choices.
> >
> >Then just lock the quill ( it's more rigid that way anyway ) and
always
> >use the whole head for movement, while under CNC control. You'd
want a
> >hefty SERVO/STEPPER motor to get any sort of speed out of the
deal, but
> >that's not a big deal.
> >
> >Problem solved.
> >
> >Now, as to the real gist of your question, your double encoder
scheme
> >has a real problem. You can certainly wire something up to "add
up"
> >the encoders, but this only makes sense if you know PRECISELY how
far
> >your drill bit in a chuck sits below some common reference point,
as
> >compared to how far your endmills in a holder sit below that same
> >reference point. God forbid you ever sharpen that bit.
> >
> >Only with this precise information does your double-encoder scheme
make
> >sense.
> >
> >Here's what I would do.
> >
> >Make a height adjustable electronic edge finder. ( A led, a
battery a
> >resistor ) The "switch" to turn on the LED is made up of the
machine
> >and the insulated top of the edge finder.
> >
> >The circuit is closed when the endmill or drill bit JUST touches
the top
> >of the edge finder.
> >
> >No great precision is needed here, except to make the top of the
edge
> >finder very parallel to your machine table.
> >
> >Now, find the X and Y zeros of your workpiece, by your normal
means.
> >
> >Next, find the top of your workpiece also. This is your Z axis
zero.
> >Clamp your edgefinder on some unused part of the table, screwed
down all
> >the way, and move the quill ( under CNC control ) over to about the
> >middle of it.
> >
> >Now slowly raise the edgefinder until the light JUST goes on. You
now
> >have a surface in a known X-Y-Z location.
> >
> >Raise the head .1 ( to avoid scarring the surface of the finder ),
move
> >to X=0, Y=0, lower the head .1 and Z also now equals 0. Mill away.
> >
> >Tool change time, raise the head ( manual or auto ), change the
tool,
> >move under CNC to the edgefinder XY location, MANUALLY lower the
tool
> >until the light JUST goes on. Zero EMC. Raise the head .1, move
to
> >X=1 ... etc.
> >
> >My wild idea, anyway.
> >
> >
> >Alan
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Alan Rothenbush | The Spartans do not ask the number
of the
> >Academic Computing Services | enemy, only where they are.
> >Simon Fraser University |
> >Burnaby, B.C., Canada | Agix of
Sparta
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
> RKBA! ***** Blessings On THee, Oh Israel!
***** 4-19!
> ----------------+----------+--------------------------+-------------
--------
> An _EFFECTIVE_ | Insured | All matter is vibration. | Let he who
hath no
> weapon in every | by COLT; | -- Max Planck | weapon sell
his
> hand = Freedom | DIAL | In the beginning was the | garment and
buy a
> on every side! | 1911-A1. | word. -- The Bible | sword.--
Jesus Christ
> ----------------+----------+--------------------------+-------------
--------
>
> Constitutional Government is dead, LONG LIVE THE
CONSTITUTION!!!!!
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Discussion Thread
alan@s...
2003-03-05 16:18:07 UTC
Re: Shoptask Z-axis - quadralift?
ccq@x...
2003-03-05 18:52:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Shoptask Z-axis - quadralift?
ballendo
2003-03-06 00:24:40 UTC
removing backlash from rack/pinion drives wasRe: Shoptask Z-axis - quadralift?
Tony Jeffree
2003-03-06 00:42:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] removing backlash from rack/pinion drives wasRe: Shoptask Z-axis - quadralift?
jmkasunich
2003-03-06 06:46:46 UTC
removing backlash from rack/pinion drives wasRe: Shoptask Z-axis - quadralift?
ccq@x...
2003-03-06 07:48:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] removing backlash from rack/pinion drives wasRe: Shoptask Z-axis - quadralift?
alan@s...
2003-03-06 09:26:27 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Shoptask Z-axis - quadralift?
paul_norton2001
2003-03-07 02:16:53 UTC
removing backlash from rack/pinion drives wasRe: Shoptask Z-axis - quadralift?
ccq@x...
2003-03-07 04:52:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] removing backlash from rack/pinion drives wasRe: Shoptask Z-axis - quadralift?