Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Repeatability of Home switches
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2003-04-02 18:18:43 UTC
In a message dated 4/2/2003 7:46:42 PM Central Standard Time,
mgamber@... writes:
output to GROUND or (-). "Source" means it connects the output to +, usually
+5 VDC.
Generally, "sink" is done with an NPN junction (transistor) which has its
emitter connected to (-) ground, and the collector is tied to "output".
"Source" is done various ways, but think of that as basically the "same, only
reverse-polarity" for "sketching purposes".
These two words, "sink" and "source" are used to express what semiconductor
junctions handling the output of an IC (etc.) are doing, but you might think
of a SPDT relay, the "wiper" being "output", and the other two contacts tied
to +ve and -ve. Then, as the relay is operated, it either "sources" or
"sinks". This is not the kind of explanation that makes silicon wizards
gleeful, but it is OK for beginners!
Jan Rowland, Ignernt ol' Troll
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
mgamber@... writes:
>mgamber: "Sink" means the part has a solid-state output that "connects" the
> The output on the switch is confusing, does sink mean that it is
> coupling the supply voltage to the output? Or is it contact closure
> like a normal switch
output to GROUND or (-). "Source" means it connects the output to +, usually
+5 VDC.
Generally, "sink" is done with an NPN junction (transistor) which has its
emitter connected to (-) ground, and the collector is tied to "output".
"Source" is done various ways, but think of that as basically the "same, only
reverse-polarity" for "sketching purposes".
These two words, "sink" and "source" are used to express what semiconductor
junctions handling the output of an IC (etc.) are doing, but you might think
of a SPDT relay, the "wiper" being "output", and the other two contacts tied
to +ve and -ve. Then, as the relay is operated, it either "sources" or
"sinks". This is not the kind of explanation that makes silicon wizards
gleeful, but it is OK for beginners!
Jan Rowland, Ignernt ol' Troll
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
mrgamber
2003-04-02 17:45:43 UTC
Repeatability of Home switches
JanRwl@A...
2003-04-02 18:18:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Repeatability of Home switches
mrgamber
2003-04-02 18:49:54 UTC
Re: Repeatability of Home switches
JanRwl@A...
2003-04-02 18:55:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Repeatability of Home switches
Jon
2003-04-02 22:05:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Repeatability of Home switches
Nigel Bailey
2003-04-03 00:59:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Repeatability of Home switches
dcdziner
2003-04-03 03:14:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Repeatability of Home switches
turbulatordude
2003-04-03 04:06:49 UTC
Re: Repeatability of Home switches
Torsten
2003-04-03 10:36:55 UTC
Re: Repeatability of Home switches
jeffdavis516
2003-04-03 10:47:58 UTC
Re: Repeatability of Home switches
CL
2003-04-03 10:51:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Repeatability of Home switches
mrgamber
2003-04-03 12:30:40 UTC
Re: Repeatability of Home switches
CL
2003-04-03 17:25:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Repeatability of Home switches
mrgamber
2003-04-04 11:50:37 UTC
Orientation was Re: Repeatability of Home switches
CL
2003-04-04 13:23:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Orientation was Re: Repeatability of Home switches
caudlet
2003-04-04 15:27:59 UTC
Orientation was Re: Repeatability of Home switches
dcdziner
2003-04-04 17:30:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Orientation was Re: Repeatability of Home switches
abbylynx
2003-04-05 06:33:56 UTC
Orientation was Re: Repeatability of Home switches
Drew Rogge
2003-04-11 11:33:28 UTC
Board size of Dan Mauch's optical tach system
Dan Mauch
2003-04-12 06:57:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Board size of Dan Mauch's optical tach system