CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Orientation was Re: Repeatability of Home switches

Posted by dcdziner
on 2003-04-04 17:30:37 UTC
Caudlet,
Take a look at the photo switch that I posted pictures of, in the
Marv's Folder today.

Marv Frankel
Los Angeles

----- Original Message -----
From: "caudlet" <info@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 3:27 PM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Orientation was Re: Repeatability of Home
switches


> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "mrgamber" <mgamber@c...>
> wrote:
> >
> > What is the recommended orientation of the switch?
> >
> > Should it be in the path of the axis and depress the lever or
> button?
> > or is it better to let it "wipe" the trigger? Wiping seems safer
> but
> > less accurate.
>
> All of my limit and home switches are the lever (wiper) type
> microswitches with rollers on the lever. The are mounted on slotted
> brackets that allow for some adjustment. The are setup so that a
> plate on the axis with rounded corners contacts the roller as it goes
> buy. If it goes too far nothing happens to the switch. I have
> hardwired limit switches past each home so that in the event of a
> runaway, it drops out the contactor feeding DC to the motors. I find
> that the home (reference in MACH1) is repeatable to .001 with these
> switches. The issue is not the step accuracy of your machine but
> rather the overall error from backlash, leadscrew non-linearity,
> etc. If you have a machine that can consistantly hold .002 after
> moving all over the place then you have a really tight machine. Why
> would you want a zero reference that was ten times more accurate than
> your machine?
> The smallest increment you can move (as long as it is less than
> desired accuracy) has little to do with overall accuracy and
> repeatability. You could make the argument that each incremental
> move would create error if your step resolution was not tiny but the
> error tends to cancel out in multiple moves. On small machines or
> precision lathes and mills they may need to hold closer tolerances
> than .001 but that requires the mechanicals be really rigid and
> ballscrews with zero backlash are in order.
>
> Non-contact switches can be made to hold a closer tolerance. One
> precision machine I just finished disassembling uses an optical
> sensor with a shutter plate that has a tiny slit. As it passes the
> sensor the slot creates a very accurate reference. They must have
> logic that first senses the edge of the plate (dark) followed by the
> slot (light) since it is light most of the time. There are proximity
> sensors, Halleffect sensors, modulated light sensors and tons of
> mechanical switch types.
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>

Discussion Thread

mrgamber 2003-04-02 17:45:43 UTC Repeatability of Home switches JanRwl@A... 2003-04-02 18:18:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Repeatability of Home switches mrgamber 2003-04-02 18:49:54 UTC Re: Repeatability of Home switches JanRwl@A... 2003-04-02 18:55:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Repeatability of Home switches Jon 2003-04-02 22:05:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Repeatability of Home switches Nigel Bailey 2003-04-03 00:59:27 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Repeatability of Home switches dcdziner 2003-04-03 03:14:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Repeatability of Home switches turbulatordude 2003-04-03 04:06:49 UTC Re: Repeatability of Home switches Torsten 2003-04-03 10:36:55 UTC Re: Repeatability of Home switches jeffdavis516 2003-04-03 10:47:58 UTC Re: Repeatability of Home switches CL 2003-04-03 10:51:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Repeatability of Home switches mrgamber 2003-04-03 12:30:40 UTC Re: Repeatability of Home switches CL 2003-04-03 17:25:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Repeatability of Home switches mrgamber 2003-04-04 11:50:37 UTC Orientation was Re: Repeatability of Home switches CL 2003-04-04 13:23:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Orientation was Re: Repeatability of Home switches caudlet 2003-04-04 15:27:59 UTC Orientation was Re: Repeatability of Home switches dcdziner 2003-04-04 17:30:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Orientation was Re: Repeatability of Home switches abbylynx 2003-04-05 06:33:56 UTC Orientation was Re: Repeatability of Home switches Drew Rogge 2003-04-11 11:33:28 UTC Board size of Dan Mauch's optical tach system Dan Mauch 2003-04-12 06:57:08 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Board size of Dan Mauch's optical tach system