CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Better servo performance: Ameteks at 60V, 80V ?

Posted by Kim Lux
on 2003-09-12 09:12:10 UTC
The next version of TurboCNC is supposed to have stepping rates well in
excess of 25 K steps/sec.



On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 00:04, Doug Fortune wrote:

>
> Here's my nickles worth (2 cents after taxes...):
>
> DeanC ( http://www.axxustech.com/ ) once told me, the supplied voltage
> to the Ametek motors could be increased (while limiting the maximum
> step rate in the software). I think he was monitoring the voltage
> at the motors, at the variously faster step rates.
>
> Of course, you have to use restraint, because then increasing the step
> rate of the software, increases the voltage seen at the motors (perhaps
> beyond their tolerance). Please contact Dean directly if you have questions
> on his method.
>
> I have no experience with the 40V Ameteks myself, but to answer your second
> question (in my 90VDC 2500rpm motor context):
>
> - Using a 75VDC powersupply driving the 80VDC max Gecko G320/G340 there
> is no over-voltage concern. However, the maximum rpm is then limited
> to 2500rpm * 75VDC/90VDC = 2083 rpm = 34.72 rps
>
> - Suppose your step engine (either software or hardware) can emit 25,000
> steps/sec max. Then an optimal rotary encoder (I'm assuming the encoder is
> mounted on the motor shaft) would be 25,000/34.72 = 720 steps-in-quadrature / revolution
> (or 720/4= 180 CPR cycles per revolution).
>
> - Suppose you actually had a 200 CPR encoder. Your step emitter source
> will be limiting your fastest speed to less than the theoretical maximum motor speed.
>
> - If you wanted to get the maximum speed from your motor (with your 25K step source),
> you would need to DECREASE your resolution down to 180 CPR. However, 180 CPR
> is uncommon, so you might consider a 150 CPR = 600 steps-in-quadrature encoder.
> Then your performance (but not your resolution) would be optimal under the
> circumstances (the circumstance being: voltage, motor rpm at that voltage,
> the max frequency of your step source, and the encoder resolution).
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Doug Fortune
> http://www.cncKITS.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--
Kim Lux <lux@...>

Discussion Thread

Nancy Weber-Zehren 2003-09-05 13:14:30 UTC CAD/CAM on Linux ballendo 2003-09-06 01:54:58 UTC Re: CAD/CAM on Linux Jon Elson 2003-09-06 15:41:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD/CAM on Linux nanmol 2003-09-10 08:32:28 UTC Re: CAD/CAM on Linux Kim Lux 2003-09-10 09:22:21 UTC Better servo performance: Ameteks at 60V, 80V ? Dan Mauch 2003-09-10 09:59:42 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Better servo performance: Ameteks at 60V, 80V ? Jon Elson 2003-09-10 10:05:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Better servo performance: Ameteks at 60V, 80V ? Kim Lux 2003-09-10 10:08:14 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Better servo performance: Ameteks at 60V, 80V ? Kim Lux 2003-09-10 10:11:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Better servo performance: Ameteks at 60V, 80V ? Dan Mauch 2003-09-10 11:45:25 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Better servo performance: Ameteks at 60V,80V ? ja_erickson 2003-09-10 15:17:37 UTC Re: Better servo performance: Ameteks at 60V, 80V ? Doug Fortune 2003-09-10 23:10:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Better servo performance: Ameteks at 60V, 80V ? deanc500 2003-09-11 07:31:56 UTC Re: Better servo performance: Ameteks at 60V, 80V ? Kim Lux 2003-09-12 09:12:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Better servo performance: Ameteks at 60V, 80V ?