Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machine flex; How much is to much?
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-09-24 10:16:44 UTC
protman16 wrote:
stainless steel, or making precision bores for engine cylinders, then
.001" at 50 - 100 Lbs load might be totally unacceptable. This is the
level of stiffness for a Bridgeport Series-I head with the double-swivel
joint. That is why the BOSS and some other CNC models did not have
the swivel there, as they needed more stiffness. The Bridgeport quill
is one of the stiffest things on that machine, it is a MASSIVE piece
of steel, precision lapped to a very tight fit in the head casting.
The cheap Chinese machines are made to much looser fits.
Without telling us what you are doing, asking for stiffness is almost
meaningless. 0.00001" deflection would send a coordinate measuring
machine to the trash bin. .005" would be excellent for a wood router.
I was playing with my mini-mill that I use mostly for testing and
demos, and find it is VERY flimsy. I can see the vise vibrating about
.01" during light cuts in aluminum with a 1/4" end mill. I can also see
the table "weave" as I crank the X axis handle. The gibs are obviously
loose, but the table feels stiff when cranking it. (I have made the mods
such that the handles can still be used for manual machining.)
Jon
>Group,It depends on what you are doing. If you are roughing out cavities in
>
>I have just completed converting a mill/drill to cnc. It has a belt
>driven spindle with a round column. For the z-axis I replaced the
>riser casting with THK LM slides that now allow the mill to have
>about 11" of travel. There are a couple of reasons why I did this.
>First is that 5" travel is too short most jobs that I run, second is
>that when boring using the quill there is too much flex resulting in
>elliptical holes (same applies for side milling).
>Currently I have not measured the amount deflection but I will
>attempt to very soon.
>My question is to the group what amount of cutter/spindle deflection
>is acceptable on this type of mill that still provides reasonable
>accuracy and good repeatability?
>
>
>
stainless steel, or making precision bores for engine cylinders, then
.001" at 50 - 100 Lbs load might be totally unacceptable. This is the
level of stiffness for a Bridgeport Series-I head with the double-swivel
joint. That is why the BOSS and some other CNC models did not have
the swivel there, as they needed more stiffness. The Bridgeport quill
is one of the stiffest things on that machine, it is a MASSIVE piece
of steel, precision lapped to a very tight fit in the head casting.
The cheap Chinese machines are made to much looser fits.
Without telling us what you are doing, asking for stiffness is almost
meaningless. 0.00001" deflection would send a coordinate measuring
machine to the trash bin. .005" would be excellent for a wood router.
I was playing with my mini-mill that I use mostly for testing and
demos, and find it is VERY flimsy. I can see the vise vibrating about
.01" during light cuts in aluminum with a 1/4" end mill. I can also see
the table "weave" as I crank the X axis handle. The gibs are obviously
loose, but the table feels stiff when cranking it. (I have made the mods
such that the handles can still be used for manual machining.)
Jon
Discussion Thread
protman16
2003-09-24 04:50:25 UTC
Machine flex; How much is to much?
Kim Lux
2003-09-24 06:16:31 UTC
CNCing the knee axis...
Weyland
2003-09-24 07:19:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing the knee axis...
Kim Lux
2003-09-24 07:38:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing the knee axis...
mayfieldtm
2003-09-24 07:47:09 UTC
Re: Machine flex; How much is to much?
Weyland
2003-09-24 07:50:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing the knee axis...
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-24 07:58:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing the knee axis...
Leslie M. Watts
2003-09-24 08:24:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine flex; How much is to much?
Peter R
2003-09-24 08:36:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing the knee axis...
Dan Mauch
2003-09-24 09:21:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing the knee axis...
barker806
2003-09-24 09:22:05 UTC
Re: CNCing the knee axis...
Marv Frankel
2003-09-24 09:40:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing the knee axis...
Jon Elson
2003-09-24 10:16:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machine flex; How much is to much?
Jon Elson
2003-09-24 10:23:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine flex; How much is to much?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2003-09-24 10:29:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machine flex; How much is to much?
R Rogers
2003-09-24 12:07:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machine flex; How much is to much?
Kim Lux
2003-09-24 12:57:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing the knee axis...
Kim Lux
2003-09-24 13:01:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing the knee axis...
Kim Lux
2003-09-24 13:05:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNCing the knee axis...
barker806
2003-09-24 13:18:03 UTC
Re: CNCing the knee axis...
Kim Lux
2003-09-24 13:26:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNCing the knee axis...
barker806
2003-09-24 16:40:25 UTC
Re: CNCing the knee axis...
Jon Elson
2003-09-24 21:23:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNCing the knee axis...
protman16
2003-09-25 04:35:24 UTC
Re: Machine flex; How much is to much?
protman16
2003-09-25 04:44:47 UTC
Re: Machine flex; How much is to much?
protman16
2003-09-25 04:47:30 UTC
Re: Machine flex; How much is to much?
Jon Elson
2003-09-25 10:08:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine flex; How much is to much?
protman16
2003-09-25 10:51:57 UTC
Re: Machine flex; How much is to much?
Jim Brown
2003-09-25 22:38:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine flex; How much is to much?
R Rogers
2003-09-26 07:10:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine flex; How much is to much?
m0nkey0ne
2003-09-26 11:19:48 UTC
Re: Machine flex; How much is to much?