Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!? was Re: software questions DRO
Posted by
vrsculptor
on 2003-09-30 07:48:13 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers <rogersmach@y...>
wrote:
threads in that: when force is applied to the table it will "feed"
the ballscrew. Acme threads have an inherent binding effect.
Ron
This isn't usually true, more like a wives tale. If your ballscrew
pitch is much more than .5 turn/inch it won't backdrive. Most mills
are several turns per inch. If this wasn't true Bridgeport would not
have offerred a manual mill with ballscrews. Check out the ballscrew
company web sites.
Roger S.
wrote:
> The most important reason to not use a CNC machine manually is asafety issue. A mill with ballscrews is unlike a mill with acme
threads in that: when force is applied to the table it will "feed"
the ballscrew. Acme threads have an inherent binding effect.
Ron
This isn't usually true, more like a wives tale. If your ballscrew
pitch is much more than .5 turn/inch it won't backdrive. Most mills
are several turns per inch. If this wasn't true Bridgeport would not
have offerred a manual mill with ballscrews. Check out the ballscrew
company web sites.
Roger S.
Discussion Thread
vlocci
2003-09-29 07:48:31 UTC
software questions DRO
Jon Elson
2003-09-29 09:57:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] software questions DRO
Kim Lux
2003-09-29 10:09:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] software questions DRO
Kim Lux
2003-09-29 10:34:01 UTC
Questions about chipbreaking inserts.
turbulatordude
2003-09-29 10:41:37 UTC
Re: Questions about chipbreaking inserts.
mayfieldtm
2003-09-29 11:58:03 UTC
Re: Questions about chipbreaking inserts.
ballendo
2003-09-30 04:26:22 UTC
Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!? was Re: software questions DRO
c_holm10017
2003-09-30 07:32:54 UTC
Re: software questions DRO
R Rogers
2003-09-30 07:33:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!? was Re: software questions DRO
vrsculptor
2003-09-30 07:48:13 UTC
Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!? was Re: software questions DRO
doug98105
2003-09-30 07:52:10 UTC
Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!? was Re: software questions DRO
Kim Lux
2003-09-30 08:42:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!? was Re: software questions DRO
Terry Owens
2003-09-30 08:42:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Questions about chipbreaking inserts.
Kim Lux
2003-09-30 08:46:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!? was Re: software questions DRO
doug98105
2003-09-30 09:21:56 UTC
Re: Questions about chipbreaking inserts.
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-30 09:48:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] OT: Questions about chipbreaking inserts.
Kim Lux
2003-09-30 09:53:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Questions about chipbreaking inserts.
Kim Lux
2003-09-30 10:23:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Questions about chipbreaking inserts.
Torsten
2003-09-30 13:48:36 UTC
Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!? was Re: software questions DRO
Chris Seeley
2003-09-30 16:13:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!? was Re: software questions DRO
R Rogers
2003-09-30 16:13:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!? was Re: software questions DRO
R Rogers
2003-09-30 16:13:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!? was Re: software questions DRO
Lee Studley
2003-09-30 16:18:16 UTC
Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!? was Re: software questions DRO
ballendo
2003-10-01 05:44:16 UTC
Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!?
mayfieldtm
2003-10-01 08:03:51 UTC
Re: Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!?
ballendo
2003-10-02 04:23:29 UTC
Re: Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!?