Handwheels on a retrofit? Why!?

Doug,

I suppose their thinking was to try and get a new group of
customers... By providing handwheels, they appeal to the people who
have used nothing else. In these "entry level" "toolroom" mills and
lathes, that's exactly the market... I'm glad you include "flat bed"
in your lathe description, because this class of tool again is more
related to "manual" than the slant beds, which are full-on CNC from
the start. And the slantbeds don't have handwheels; though there is
almost always an MPG...

I'm not opposed to having a wheel device for usability; it's the idea
that traditional handwheels are somehow "necessary" or "useful" that
seems to me to be preventing folks from realising the true potential
of their CNC investment...

Ballendo

P.S. Remember when the "brights" switch was on the floor of your car?
Now it's on the steering column. Same function, different location.
(I'm sure this was done for mfg. reasons-wire harness and all- but it
does serve to remind us how "stuck" we get with the way
things "should" be; at least those of us who had to make the
transition and uselessly pounded the car floor with our foot a few
times in the process<G>)


--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "doug98105"
<doug.rasmussen@c...> wrote:

> Guys,
>
> Given a choice, I'd rather have handwheels than not. I don't think
> I'd pay a large premium to have them as an option on a machine
> though.
>
> I notice Haas and Fadal have handwheels as a standard feature on
> their new "toolroom" machines. LeBlond Machino had them on
> their "toolmaker's" mill. Virtually all the makers of CNC flat bed
> lathes have included handwheels. What do you suppose their
> thinking was?
>
> Incidently, all the above are electronic handwheels so the problems
> Richard mentioned of machining with ballscrews do not apply. The
> handweels as above require the control to be "on" to function.
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers <rogersmach@y...>
> wrote:
> > The most important reason to not use a CNC machine manually is a
> safety issue. A mill with ballscrews is unlike a mill with acme
> threads in that: when force is applied to the table it will "feed"
> the ballscrew. Acme threads have an inherent binding effect. Think
> of a scissor jack. Try it, unhook one of your drive motors and push
> on the table. Now turn the handwheel in the direction you are
> pushing it will keep spinning. Push hard enough and it will gain
> speed. So, if you are manual milling with ballscrews and a large
> rougher and it grabs the work piece. The table will not hold
> position on its own resulting in a very dangerous scenario. It's
> best to operate as outlined below.
> >
> > Ron
> >
> >
> >
> > ballendo <ballendo@y...> wrote:
> > Kim,
> >
> > I completely agree...
> >
> > I just posted this on the turbocnc list; seems appropriate to

this

> > thread:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > How about these reasons:
> >
> > 1)"Jogging" is just power feed on all axes. Work all day without
> your
> > hand/arm getting tired, and feed more evenly than most can turn a
> > wheel... AND "GO" faster than you can turn the handle.
> >
> > 2)Using incremental jog values you can easily stop on a dime...

or

> > a "tenth" if you will EVERY TIME... Need to drill a series of
> > holes? set the distance as a jog increment, and a single keypress
> > replaces precision turning of the handwheel...(especially

valuable

> > when the distance is something like .3794;or do you wanna do that
> > addition in yer head?) of course with the CNC powered up, you

have

> > DROS, so you can reset zero instead... When you get where you're
> > going, another keypress (Z minus) drills the hole...
> >
> > 3)With some controls, you can save each jog move to a file, so
> > whatever you've done can be repeated...
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> >
> > Ballendo
> >
> > P.S. These things are why I don't understand the desire to keep
> > handwheels in place on a CNC retrofit... This type of 3 axis,
> > distance precise, powerfeed is what most MANUAL machinists WISH
> FOR!!!
> >
> > I hear people saying, "I'll keep the handwheels for those jobs
> where
> > it's just not "worth" turning the computer on." Just what type of
> > part is that?!? In windows, maybe;with its long boot time. But in
> > DOS, I'll betcha I have the part more accurately made faster than
> a
> > person turning the wheels... The second argument is "feel", but
> one
> > learns quickly to replace this feel with other senses; much like

a

> > blind person relies on senses other than sight. I can smell,

hear,

> > see, and yes, even FEEL(place my free hand on the ways, and feel
> > vibration, etc.), what the machine is doing...
> >
> >
> > --- In turbocnc@yahoogroups.com, " T . Ackland" wrote:
> > > I was of the impression that the jog is just used to touch the
> work
> > > piece with the cutter and then Zero'd or whatever figure you
> want
> > > to entered through the jog screen.
> > > I cannot see the advantage of machining with the jog over
> turning a
> > > handle?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Kim Lux wrote:
> > >
> > > We just put electronic handwheels on our CNC equipment. By
> > electronic,
> > > I mean that the feedwheel is attached to an encoder and the
> signal
> > from
> > > the encoder is fed to the CNC software, TurboCNC in this case.
> > >
> > > I think this is much more practical and powerful than retaining
> the
> > > mechanical handwheels. For example, one can operate in MDI

mode,

> > using
> > > the electronic feedwheels to position the tool and then issue a
> > manual
> > > feed like drilling (G78) or straight feed (G77). With mechanical
> > > handwheels, one would be stuck drilling or feeding manually.

With

> > > TurboCNC, one has feedrate override as well. The time this

saves

> > when
> > > drilling and milling is incredible, to say nothing of being

able

> to
> > > manually position and then do some arcs ie G02 and G03.
> > >
> > > Kim
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:56, Jon Elson wrote:
> > > > vlocci wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >I'm just getting started on a conversion and have a few
> > software
> > > > >questions that I haven't found answered in the archives. I'm
> > inclined
> > > > >to keep the handwheels on my mill, since I plan on the
> > occasional job
> > > > >done by hand.
> > > > >
> > > > >1) Assuming I use servo's with encoders, can I use the
> encoders
> > as a
> > > > >source for positiong info that can be displayed within a
> > software
> > > > >package as a DRO? Which software packages allow this? Is EMC
> > my
> > > > >only choice?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > I think Mach 1 and 2 may support this.
> > > >
> > > > >2) Is the above possible with steppers instead of servo's?
> Can
> > it be
> > > > >done without encoders? Which software allows this?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > How can you measure position without encoders?
> > > >
> > > > >I realize I'm limited by the accuracy of the axis ACME
> threads,
> > I.e.
> > > > >backlash induced errors (a ballscrew conversion is in the
> > future, but
> > > > >I want to get things running first)
> > > > >
> > > > >Realize that I dont necessarily need CNC capabilities and

the

> > option
> > > > >of manual DRO read out at the same time. (real time jumping
> back
> > and
> > > > >forth) I'm only after the ability to either cnc a part
> > automatically
> > > > >(hands off), or elect to manually do things with a computer
> > driven
> > > > >DRO arrangement. Can this be done?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > > >
> > > > >If it matters, I'm considering Gecko drives (either servo or
> > stepper)
> > > > >but am open to a change if it offers me DRO capability.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > You don't say what size machine you are planning on
> converting.
> > But,
> > > > for the
> > > > larger machines, it may be cheaper to go with servos, if you
> plan
> > on
> > > > using encoders
> > > > for DRO readout anyway. Also, sevo motors won't drag as much
> > when you
> > > > move the machine manually.
> > > >
> > > > Jon
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Addresses:
> > > > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > > > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > > > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> > wanliker@a..., timg@k...
> > > > Moderator: pentam@c... indigo_red@q... [Moderators]
> > > > URL to this group:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > > >
> > > > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > > > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> > aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> reach
> > it if you have trouble.
> > > > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
> > to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same

members

> > are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> > > >
> > > > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> > POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
> > EXCEPTIONS........
> > > > bill
> > > > List Mom
> > > > List Owner
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > --
> > > Kim Lux
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@a...,
> timg@k...
> > Moderator: pentam@c... indigo_red@q... [Moderators]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> reach it if you have trouble.
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to
> be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
> there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY

POSTING

> THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO

EXCEPTIONS........

> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]