Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Questions about chipbreaking inserts.

On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 10:21, doug98105 wrote:
> Terry & Kim,
>
> I think it is on topic. Chip breaking is very relevant to automatic
> machining, without chip breaking you can't effectively machine
> automatically as Kim is finding out.
>
> The problem as I see it is not enough HP, too light a feed and depth
> of cut. When I run into a problem of non-chip breaking I up the
> feed and depth of cut. .020" depth of cut is awfully small to
> expect chip breaking.
>
> The insert style, triangle, is okay, but for heavy cuts I think an
> eighty degree diamond may be better. Besides being a more rigid
> insert the diamond can both turn and face. The triangle is limited
> to turning or facing, but not both with the same setting.
>
> Doug
>
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Terry Owens"
> <wotisname@l...> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is really a machining problem and as such has no place on
> this list. I
> > have been machining stainless steel for a few weeks with the same
> problems
> > if you want to email me offlist.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Terry
> >
> >
> > > We are running chip breaking inserts on our CNC retrofit lathe.
> (13x40,
> > > 2 HP)
> > >
> > > We've got a little problem with swarf buildup, actually a big
> problem.
> > > When we machine a part of considerable size, removing a
> significant
> > > amount of material, the swarf will build up around the chuck,
> choke the
> > > coolant flow to the tool, etc. We often can't run a complete
> program in
> > > one go without having to periodically stop and clean things
> out. This
> > > becomes a big pain.
> > >
> > > Details: we are running TCMT321 (7 degree rake) inserts. This
> weekend
> > > we were machining 3" diameter 4140 steel parts. Total volume of
> > > material removed was about 6 inches^3. We were turning at 750
> RPM,
> > > feeding a nominal F6 on a 20 thou cut. By nominal, I mean that
> someone
> > > might have been running a 50 to 300% feedrate override. Our
> tool height
> > > is set almost exactly at center height.
> > >
> > > The "chips" we were getting off are really 6" to 18" long swarf
> > > stringers. We have machined steel and gotten actual chips off,
> but I
> > > can't remember exactly when or under what conditions.
> > >
> > > Questions:
> > >
> > > a) what sort of chip breaking performance should we be seeing ?
> > >
> > > b) would the lack of chip breaking performance have anything to
> do with
> > > running a relatively small insert (ie 321) for the depth of cut ?
> > >
> > > c) how does one prevent a massive buildup of swarf in and around
> the
> > > chuck and tooling ?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > >
> > > Kim
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--
Kim Lux <lux@...>