CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: rs274

on 2003-12-03 05:56:30 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
>
>
> bull2003winkle wrote:
>
> >--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "asi" <asigraph@b...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
> >>hi jon thenks but icant find it ineia website
> >>if u can help me ther is a link?
> >>thenks asi
> >>
> >>
> >asi:

ASI:

I have to agree with JON and others that have posted here. I have the
current ANSI RS274 and the latest NIST, and ISO revisions.

My question would be, If you had all this, what would you do with it.
The spec is a good description of how to control a machine but most
manufacturers have extensions or modifications that cause a part
program that runs well one machine to produce scrap or not even run on
another.

Many ANSI specifications have served the industry well but this one
has been violated to such an extent that is only good as a reference.

Ken

Discussion Thread

asi 2003-11-30 08:42:39 UTC rs274 Jon Elson 2003-11-30 22:02:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rs274 asi 2003-12-02 11:40:03 UTC Re: rs274 bull2003winkle 2003-12-02 12:53:28 UTC Re: rs274 ballendo 2003-12-02 17:11:26 UTC Re: rs274 Jerry Kimberlin 2003-12-02 18:00:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: rs274 Jon Elson 2003-12-02 21:35:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: rs274 Jon Elson 2003-12-02 21:39:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: rs274 bull2003winkle 2003-12-03 05:56:30 UTC Re: rs274 asi 2003-12-03 15:05:12 UTC Re: rs274 Jerry Kimberlin 2003-12-03 17:41:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: rs274 asi 2003-12-04 04:50:13 UTC Re: rs274