RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Posted by
Leslie M. Watts
on 2004-04-20 05:50:11 UTC
Ballendo,
I checked again... I did not read far enough in the thread.
The earlier posts were unstable designs but I see that
evolved into a proper 3 bearing unit. The only thing I saw
missing was a light spring preload for the back deep groove
bearing- it floats, but still needs a mimimum axial load
to prevent ball scuffing due to internal clearance. Perhaps
it was there and I didn't see it.
And yes... I will again emphasize that this requires VERY
precise machining. As Marcus and I have mentioned such critical
work can be done with even small light lathes, ring laps, and
stones. It really hinges on the ability to measure. We are
talking tolerances here that many would find difficult to
repeatably measure even with a 0.0001" micrometer. It can be done
with a lot of careful hand fitting. That is almost a lost art
but threads like this can help preserve it.
Les
Leslie M.Watts
L M Watts Furniture
Tiger Georgia USA
(706) 212-0242
http://www.lmwatts.com
Engineering page:
http://www.lmwatts.com/shop.html
CNC surplus for sale:
http://www.lmwatts.com/forsale.html
CNC carved signs:
http://www.lmwatts.com/signwp.html
-----Original Message-----
From: ballendo [mailto:ballendo@...]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 10:49 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Les,
You lost me. It IS a 3 bearing design. Or is the face ground AC
bearing set considered "one" bearing?
This design has been used successfully on many commercial spindles
for years. If by three bearing you mean the ground faced set, another
bearing spaced from them, and then the third radial bearing for the
pulley end; I agree. That design is MUCH stiffer. AND MUCH more
expensive. Also requires a GREAT deal more precision in the making...
The design finally arrived at, is sold by some well known mfr's as a
separate spindle to "bolt-on" to industrial process machinery. I'd
certainly trust it for use in a small mill or as a bolt-on for a
gantry machine. I wouldn't use cat40 on it...
Ballendo
I checked again... I did not read far enough in the thread.
The earlier posts were unstable designs but I see that
evolved into a proper 3 bearing unit. The only thing I saw
missing was a light spring preload for the back deep groove
bearing- it floats, but still needs a mimimum axial load
to prevent ball scuffing due to internal clearance. Perhaps
it was there and I didn't see it.
And yes... I will again emphasize that this requires VERY
precise machining. As Marcus and I have mentioned such critical
work can be done with even small light lathes, ring laps, and
stones. It really hinges on the ability to measure. We are
talking tolerances here that many would find difficult to
repeatably measure even with a 0.0001" micrometer. It can be done
with a lot of careful hand fitting. That is almost a lost art
but threads like this can help preserve it.
Les
Leslie M.Watts
L M Watts Furniture
Tiger Georgia USA
(706) 212-0242
http://www.lmwatts.com
Engineering page:
http://www.lmwatts.com/shop.html
CNC surplus for sale:
http://www.lmwatts.com/forsale.html
CNC carved signs:
http://www.lmwatts.com/signwp.html
-----Original Message-----
From: ballendo [mailto:ballendo@...]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 10:49 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Les,
You lost me. It IS a 3 bearing design. Or is the face ground AC
bearing set considered "one" bearing?
This design has been used successfully on many commercial spindles
for years. If by three bearing you mean the ground faced set, another
bearing spaced from them, and then the third radial bearing for the
pulley end; I agree. That design is MUCH stiffer. AND MUCH more
expensive. Also requires a GREAT deal more precision in the making...
The design finally arrived at, is sold by some well known mfr's as a
separate spindle to "bolt-on" to industrial process machinery. I'd
certainly trust it for use in a small mill or as a bolt-on for a
gantry machine. I wouldn't use cat40 on it...
Ballendo
Discussion Thread
george_barr
2004-04-13 11:33:58 UTC
VFD Selection
george_barr
2004-04-13 11:37:05 UTC
Re: VFD Selection
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-13 11:47:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD Selection
george_barr
2004-04-13 12:17:57 UTC
Re: VFD Selection
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-13 13:03:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD Selection
george_barr
2004-04-13 13:29:41 UTC
Re: VFD Selection
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-13 14:24:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD Selection
Drew Rogge
2004-04-13 14:32:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD Selection
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-13 15:10:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD Selection
george_barr
2004-04-13 15:38:39 UTC
Re: VFD Selection
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-13 16:56:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
ballendo
2004-04-13 17:16:59 UTC
Re: VFD Selection
David A. Frantz
2004-04-13 17:43:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD Selection
Rick Chownyk
2004-04-13 19:43:13 UTC
Re: VFD Selection
george_barr
2004-04-13 20:50:15 UTC
Re: VFD Selection
turbulatordude
2004-04-13 21:37:15 UTC
Re: VFD Selection- alternate spindles
Vince Negrete
2004-04-13 23:02:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Jon Elson
2004-04-13 23:14:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD Selection
Jon Elson
2004-04-13 23:23:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD Selection
Jon Elson
2004-04-13 23:27:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD Selection
Bill Vance
2004-04-14 00:18:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD Selection
Greg Nuspel
2004-04-14 03:24:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Nick Ibbitson
2004-04-14 03:25:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Nick Ibbitson
2004-04-14 03:30:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD Selection- alternate spindles
Greg Nuspel
2004-04-14 03:34:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD Selection- alternate spindles
Vince Negrete
2004-04-14 03:42:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-14 06:26:02 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
james_cullins@s...
2004-04-14 06:32:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Vince Negrete
2004-04-14 07:51:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-14 10:05:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Henrik Olsson
2004-04-14 11:54:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD Selection
TODD BOMBACI
2004-04-14 13:50:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Greg Nuspel
2004-04-14 15:55:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Robert Benchic
2004-04-14 16:51:15 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-14 17:08:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
David A. Frantz
2004-04-15 04:35:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD Selection
David A. Frantz
2004-04-15 05:04:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-15 07:04:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Marcus and Eva
2004-04-15 08:16:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-15 09:05:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
ballendo
2004-04-16 07:29:25 UTC
Re: VFD Selection- alternate spindles
ballendo
2004-04-16 07:30:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-16 09:08:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Greg Nuspel
2004-04-16 15:22:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
ballendo
2004-04-19 12:43:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-19 16:10:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
ballendo
2004-04-19 20:08:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
Leslie M. Watts
2004-04-20 05:50:11 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)
ballendo
2004-04-21 09:53:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]spindle plans (was VFD Selection)