Re: Gecko320 on 88 VDC and 15 amps
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2005-02-19 08:04:38 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Dan Mauch" <dmauch@s...>
wrote:
Mariss has completed the Vampire dirve and is gearing up for
production.... means he recognizes how dumb we are with making
mistakes in installing. ie: enough failures to warrent attention.
There is an energy dump circuit. It is quite possible Rutex offers
that in the drive ? I would kinda expect that the G3x line may get a
Vampire mod in the future ?
Mariss had mentioned that the normal failures under 80 volts is
almost insignifigant.
and that failures above 100 volts is excessive.
and that returned energy can spike by 20% or so (kinda fuzzy on the
numbers as I read the test results so long ago) But, it was scarry
to think that running a drive near rating would kill it.
Witness the Xylotex boards. the chip is rated for 35 volts. and
fails at 36 volts. instead of shooting for an energy dump, they
derated the power suply to 24 volts to reduce the problem.
I think those drivers when used at 32 volts (24xfmr) were falling
like flies.
So, knowing there is a back emf, and knowing how high it will spike,
you can predict what voltage your drives will see. Enter the energy
dump circuits.
As I noted in another post, there are more than enough power supply
options to get the proper voltage, there are enough motor options as
well.
In my case, I think I need about 300 watts for the plasma table. so,
I'm designing around a 1-1/2 hp 110 V motor. that will offer much
closer to 1,000 watts, so if I just lose the whole upper half (
speed, votage amps), I still have more power than I require.
Dave
wrote:
> As I recall the G320 and the Rutex 100V20A servo amps both use theIRF540
> fets. The only difference is the conservative rating thatGeckodrives places
> on the G320/G340'sIf I can read between the lines.......
> Dan
Mariss has completed the Vampire dirve and is gearing up for
production.... means he recognizes how dumb we are with making
mistakes in installing. ie: enough failures to warrent attention.
There is an energy dump circuit. It is quite possible Rutex offers
that in the drive ? I would kinda expect that the G3x line may get a
Vampire mod in the future ?
Mariss had mentioned that the normal failures under 80 volts is
almost insignifigant.
and that failures above 100 volts is excessive.
and that returned energy can spike by 20% or so (kinda fuzzy on the
numbers as I read the test results so long ago) But, it was scarry
to think that running a drive near rating would kill it.
Witness the Xylotex boards. the chip is rated for 35 volts. and
fails at 36 volts. instead of shooting for an energy dump, they
derated the power suply to 24 volts to reduce the problem.
I think those drivers when used at 32 volts (24xfmr) were falling
like flies.
So, knowing there is a back emf, and knowing how high it will spike,
you can predict what voltage your drives will see. Enter the energy
dump circuits.
As I noted in another post, there are more than enough power supply
options to get the proper voltage, there are enough motor options as
well.
In my case, I think I need about 300 watts for the plasma table. so,
I'm designing around a 1-1/2 hp 110 V motor. that will offer much
closer to 1,000 watts, so if I just lose the whole upper half (
speed, votage amps), I still have more power than I require.
Dave
Discussion Thread
gentletouch7777
2005-02-14 06:58:22 UTC
Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
braidmeister
2005-02-14 08:10:52 UTC
Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
cnc_4_me
2005-02-14 13:33:44 UTC
Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
Luke1027
2005-02-15 01:48:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
braidmeister
2005-02-15 05:52:30 UTC
Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
Alan Marconett
2005-02-15 09:30:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
Luke1027
2005-02-18 12:40:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
Alan Marconett
2005-02-18 14:29:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
Luke1027
2005-02-18 18:41:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
Dave
2005-02-18 18:49:17 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
R Rogers
2005-02-18 19:03:01 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko320 on 88 VDC and 15 amps
braidmeister
2005-02-18 21:45:26 UTC
Re: Gecko320 on 88 VDC and 15 amps
Polaraligned
2005-02-19 04:00:17 UTC
Re: Gecko320 on 88 VDC and 15 amps
turbulatordude
2005-02-19 06:54:48 UTC
Re: Gecko320 on 88 VDC and 15 amps
Dan Mauch
2005-02-19 07:30:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko320 on 88 VDC and 15 amps
turbulatordude
2005-02-19 08:04:38 UTC
Re: Gecko320 on 88 VDC and 15 amps
Alan Marconett
2005-02-19 09:30:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
Luke1027
2005-02-19 19:40:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
Jon Elson
2005-02-19 21:41:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5
Alan Marconett
2005-02-20 10:51:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Can I drip feed a bridgeport boss 5