Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CADCAM software
Posted by
Erie Patsellis
on 2005-10-19 16:01:29 UTC
OMG, he lives! (lurks?)
erie
Tim Goldstein wrote:
erie
Tim Goldstein wrote:
>Personal experience from having bought lots of CAD/CAM packages from low end
>to high end is you get what you pay for. I would have saved a lot of money
>if I had just bought a high end package up front. I own/have owned
>FeatureCAM, VisualMill, Vector, Dolphin, DeskCNC, STLWorks, MeshCAM, and
>more that I am probably forgetting. I am very happy with FeatureCAM and use
>it for the largest majority of my work. I occasionally use VisualMill for a
>few 3D Rotary things that FeatureCAM does not handle well. I still use
>Vector occasionally. The rest basically go unused.
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
fortyfingers@a...
2005-10-18 09:24:22 UTC
CADCAM software
Fred Smith
2005-10-18 09:46:34 UTC
Re: CADCAM software
Dave Fisher
2005-10-18 10:39:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CADCAM software
John Johnson
2005-10-18 10:49:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CADCAM software
Andrey Lipavsky
2005-10-18 11:32:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CADCAM software
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-18 18:52:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CADCAM software
shadi_salhab_78
2005-10-18 21:25:37 UTC
Re: CADCAM software
caedave
2005-10-19 04:51:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CADCAM software
nanmol
2005-10-19 06:22:18 UTC
Re: CADCAM software
Tim Goldstein
2005-10-19 15:19:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CADCAM software
Erie Patsellis
2005-10-19 16:01:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CADCAM software
Ron Kline
2005-10-19 17:27:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CADCAM software
timgoldstein
2005-10-19 20:02:21 UTC
Re: CADCAM software
Andrew Werby
2005-10-20 12:29:56 UTC
Re: Re: CADCAM software