Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Posted by
Graham Stabler
on 2006-04-02 03:29:14 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@...> wrote:
ago) and they wouldn't be that hard to make, either. I have some
little ones, basically two wires suspended in a magnetic field, with
a tiny mirror glued in the middle of the wires.
You are right, you can get galvos surplus but that is only half of th
story. You also need amplifiers and more importantly software. If
you want to do precise work you also need to correct for the focussing
lens, the lens is normally put after the mirrors so that the angled
beam at the back focal plane causes an offset at the focus but one
which is still relatively vertical. Laser light show software doesn't
have this facility although I am sure the CAD could be suitably warped
or the g-code generated in a special way.
The type of galvos used for this sort of work tend to be servo types
with a PM rotor and a capacitive feedback sensor IIRC, there is a
great site showing some homemade ones of these doing a nice laser
light show but again a light show is not quite the same as STL.
Anything is possible
Graham
> Actually, galvanometer-mirror drivers can be found on the surplusmarket (they used to use them in direct-writing oscillographs 50 years
ago) and they wouldn't be that hard to make, either. I have some
little ones, basically two wires suspended in a magnetic field, with
a tiny mirror glued in the middle of the wires.
You are right, you can get galvos surplus but that is only half of th
story. You also need amplifiers and more importantly software. If
you want to do precise work you also need to correct for the focussing
lens, the lens is normally put after the mirrors so that the angled
beam at the back focal plane causes an offset at the focus but one
which is still relatively vertical. Laser light show software doesn't
have this facility although I am sure the CAD could be suitably warped
or the g-code generated in a special way.
The type of galvos used for this sort of work tend to be servo types
with a PM rotor and a capacitive feedback sensor IIRC, there is a
great site showing some homemade ones of these doing a nice laser
light show but again a light show is not quite the same as STL.
Anything is possible
Graham
Discussion Thread
skullworks
2006-03-26 22:08:25 UTC
Stereolithograpy revisited
skykotech
2006-03-27 09:38:23 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
juan gelt
2006-03-27 12:13:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
turyga1963
2006-03-31 18:45:06 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Graham Stabler
2006-04-01 04:10:05 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
BRIAN FOLEY
2006-04-01 05:20:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Michael Noltkamper
2006-04-01 05:27:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Dave Fisher
2006-04-01 05:35:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Graham Stabler
2006-04-01 06:21:07 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
juan gelt
2006-04-01 12:12:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Graham Stabler
2006-04-01 17:25:10 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
wanliker@a...
2006-04-01 17:39:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Jon Elson
2006-04-01 21:58:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Graham Stabler
2006-04-02 03:29:14 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
skykotech
2006-04-02 08:39:32 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
juan gelt
2006-04-02 16:40:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
skykotech
2006-04-02 18:31:21 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
wthomas@g...
2006-04-02 21:31:29 UTC
W.E.T.: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
turyga1963
2006-04-03 01:42:37 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Graham Stabler
2006-04-03 03:58:53 UTC
W.E.T.: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Graham Stabler
2006-04-03 03:58:56 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
turyga1963
2006-04-04 00:26:31 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
laserted007
2006-04-04 15:59:45 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
vrsculptor
2006-04-05 10:09:52 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited