Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Posted by
Graham Stabler
on 2006-04-03 03:58:56 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "turyga1963" <TIntruder@...>
wrote:
galvos have nothing like that.
I agree with your overall point but as commercial STL machines are not
operated in refrigerated rooms and do not have granite bases I am not
sure where you are getting this from. Perhaps micro via drilling needs
this, STL I doubt.
Graham
wrote:
>no one mentioned drilling holes.
> In order to drill a hole in the right place, it has to sync
> perfectly with the correct laser pulse and be absolutely steady when
> it does.
> If you plan on using galvos effectively, you also better plan onMost commercial laser cutting systems (see synrad.com etc) using
> buying a really big and heavy granite optical bench to mount
> everything on and provide rigidity for the entire system, galvo,
> motion, and beam path.
galvos have nothing like that.
> Hmmmm...better budget for environmental control system that keepsLaser marking systems are commonly used on the shop floor.
> the temperature +/- 2 degrees too.
I agree with your overall point but as commercial STL machines are not
operated in refrigerated rooms and do not have granite bases I am not
sure where you are getting this from. Perhaps micro via drilling needs
this, STL I doubt.
Graham
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@> wrote:
> >
> > Graham Stabler wrote:
> >
> > >--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, juan gelt <juangelt@>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>has everybody had a chance to expound on his opinions?
> > >>very well, now here are some facts:
> >
> >>http://www.technology.niagarac.on.ca/people/mcsele/lasers/index.htm
> l
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >Firstly your assumption is that just because you can make a UV
> laser
> > >it must be suitable for stereo lithography but I doubt you have
> any
> > >idea if that is the case or not. I don't.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Yeah, the Nitrogen transmission line laser is usually run at 1 -
> 10 Hz
> > rep rate.
> > It would be pretty hard to do any real assembly with only 10
> pulses per
> > second.
> >
> > >What I should of said was we can't afford galvos anyway, my real
> point
> > >being there is not much point worrying about issues pertaining to
> > >technologies that are out of our reach (practically). I was
> refering
> > >to the post directly before mine only.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Actually, galvanometer-mirror drivers can be found on the surplus
> market
> > (they
> > used to use them in direct-writing oscillographs 50 years ago) and
> they
> > wouldn't
> > be that hard to make, either. I have some little ones, basically
> two
> > wires suspended
> > in a magnetic field, with a tiny mirror glued in the middle of the
> wires.
> >
> > Jon
> >
>
Discussion Thread
skullworks
2006-03-26 22:08:25 UTC
Stereolithograpy revisited
skykotech
2006-03-27 09:38:23 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
juan gelt
2006-03-27 12:13:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
turyga1963
2006-03-31 18:45:06 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Graham Stabler
2006-04-01 04:10:05 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
BRIAN FOLEY
2006-04-01 05:20:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Michael Noltkamper
2006-04-01 05:27:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Dave Fisher
2006-04-01 05:35:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Graham Stabler
2006-04-01 06:21:07 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
juan gelt
2006-04-01 12:12:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Graham Stabler
2006-04-01 17:25:10 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
wanliker@a...
2006-04-01 17:39:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Jon Elson
2006-04-01 21:58:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Graham Stabler
2006-04-02 03:29:14 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
skykotech
2006-04-02 08:39:32 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
juan gelt
2006-04-02 16:40:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
skykotech
2006-04-02 18:31:21 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
wthomas@g...
2006-04-02 21:31:29 UTC
W.E.T.: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
turyga1963
2006-04-03 01:42:37 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Graham Stabler
2006-04-03 03:58:53 UTC
W.E.T.: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
Graham Stabler
2006-04-03 03:58:56 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
turyga1963
2006-04-04 00:26:31 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
laserted007
2006-04-04 15:59:45 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited
vrsculptor
2006-04-05 10:09:52 UTC
Re: Stereolithograpy revisited