CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: bridgeport boss servo

on 2006-09-07 08:18:35 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Les Newell <lesnewell@...>
wrote:
>
> The motor itself should be ideal. Mechanically it should be pretty
much
> a drop in replacement. A Gecko drive will have problems with the
2000
> count encoder. Apart from the speed issues Jon mentioned, Geckos
tend to
> have tuning problems with high resolution encoders. However a
Rutex
> drive, such as the R990H should be ideal <http://www.rutex.com>.
Rutex
> drives are designed for differential encoders and the on-board
pulse
> multiplier will sort out the speed issues.
>
> Les
>

Would the R990H2 be better? It is 200V/10A. The motor is 140V Max,
6.8A stall current. The R990H is 100V/20A. I don't really know
what I'm looking at, but it looks more fitting to me.

Nathan

Discussion Thread

rocketscientistnate 2006-09-06 20:03:13 UTC bridgeport boss servo Jon Elson 2006-09-06 21:19:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] bridgeport boss servo Les Newell 2006-09-07 01:35:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] bridgeport boss servo Dan Mauch 2006-09-07 08:05:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] bridgeport boss servo rocketscientistnate 2006-09-07 08:18:35 UTC Re: bridgeport boss servo Les Newell 2006-09-07 08:57:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: bridgeport boss servo rocketscientistnate 2006-09-07 10:20:33 UTC Re: bridgeport boss servo Les Newell 2006-09-07 12:09:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: bridgeport boss servo rocketscientistnate 2006-09-07 13:30:11 UTC Re: bridgeport boss servo Les Newell 2006-09-07 15:06:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: bridgeport boss servo rocketscientistnate 2006-09-07 18:26:46 UTC Re: bridgeport boss servo Les Newell 2006-09-08 00:55:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: bridgeport boss servo rocketscientistnate 2006-09-08 08:25:07 UTC Re: bridgeport boss servo