Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: automated "labjack"
Posted by
David G. LeVine
on 2007-03-30 09:11:18 UTC
At 08:39 AM 3/30/2007, you wrote:
flexible and light, but i$ expen$ive. The
thinner the wall the more flexible and the less pressure it will handle.
Tygon, vinyl, etc. are tougher and less flexible,
but handle higher pressures better and is Ā¢heaper.
Nylon is really stiff... You know the drill.
A simple question: How fast, how often and how
much weight need to be handled? If it is a light
load, a tiny electric motor with gear reduction
and a cam system might be best. Two or four
small wires are pretty simple to add to the head
cabling. Limit switches would make it 4 wires,
mechanical stops and current sensors would work.
David G. LeVine
Nashua, NH 03060
----------
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.22/739 - Release Date: 3/29/2007 1:36 PM
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>Only a few very light wires to the auger motor,Small bore silicone rubber hose can be very
>I'm just not sure about the flexibility of air hoses one way or the other.
flexible and light, but i$ expen$ive. The
thinner the wall the more flexible and the less pressure it will handle.
Tygon, vinyl, etc. are tougher and less flexible,
but handle higher pressures better and is Ā¢heaper.
Nylon is really stiff... You know the drill.
A simple question: How fast, how often and how
much weight need to be handled? If it is a light
load, a tiny electric motor with gear reduction
and a cam system might be best. Two or four
small wires are pretty simple to add to the head
cabling. Limit switches would make it 4 wires,
mechanical stops and current sensors would work.
David G. LeVine
Nashua, NH 03060
----------
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.22/739 - Release Date: 3/29/2007 1:36 PM
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Graham Stabler
2007-03-28 03:47:54 UTC
automated "labjack"
R Wink
2007-03-28 04:05:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
R Wink
2007-03-28 04:05:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
R Wink
2007-03-28 04:07:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
R Wink
2007-03-28 04:07:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
R Wink
2007-03-28 04:12:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-28 04:44:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Drew Rogge
2007-03-28 07:17:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Graham Stabler
2007-03-28 11:25:44 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
Archie
2007-03-28 11:40:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Andy Wander
2007-03-28 11:49:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Bob Campbell
2007-03-28 11:57:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
R Wink
2007-03-28 12:04:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-28 12:19:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-28 12:22:39 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Graham Stabler
2007-03-28 12:57:54 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
R Wink
2007-03-28 13:46:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-28 14:41:04 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-28 14:50:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-28 14:51:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-28 15:10:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
wanliker@a...
2007-03-28 15:20:43 UTC
automated "labjack"
wanliker@a...
2007-03-28 15:36:53 UTC
automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-28 23:14:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-29 01:01:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
Graham Stabler
2007-03-29 02:41:52 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-29 03:30:42 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-29 04:28:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automated "labjack"
turbulatordude
2007-03-29 06:05:34 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
Graham Stabler
2007-03-29 13:41:27 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
Graham Stabler
2007-03-29 13:41:51 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-29 15:21:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: automated "labjack"
ballendo
2007-03-29 23:52:55 UTC
Automated "lifter"
ballendo
2007-03-30 00:07:59 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
ballendo
2007-03-30 00:12:11 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
Graham Stabler
2007-03-30 04:33:25 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
Graham Stabler
2007-03-30 04:40:38 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
Graham Stabler
2007-03-30 04:44:31 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-30 05:09:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: automated "labjack"
Graham Stabler
2007-03-30 06:45:34 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
David G. LeVine
2007-03-30 09:11:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: automated "labjack"
Graham Stabler
2007-03-30 11:54:37 UTC
Re: automated "labjack"
Alan KM6VV
2007-03-30 12:47:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: automated "labjack"
R Wink
2007-03-30 14:43:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: automated "labjack"
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-30 15:03:42 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: automated "labjack"