Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: single axis control
Posted by
David G. LeVine
on 2012-10-23 20:20:08 UTC
On 10/23/2012 02:12 PM, John Dammeyer wrote:
Windows, $150 for Mach), I currently have installed it on a 384 MB
PII650 with a 20 GB HDD. Those are not high cost machines, and Mach
will need no less machine.
There is a learning curve with LinuxCNC, but there is also one with
Mach. If you are an experienced Mach user, and it is a commercial
application, use Mach. Your time is money. Also buy a faster machine,
a 2.2 GHz+/2GB/250 GB system is cheap enough and will save you time.
The same applies to LinuxCNC, if you are a LinuxCNC user, use it, buy a
faster PC and don't look back.
In a commercial application, a few billable hours can make or break a
project.
Dave 8{)
--
/"The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look
at the men he has around him."/
Niccolo Machiavelli
/
NOTE TO ALL:
When forwarding emails, please use only "Blind Carbon Copy" or "Bcc" for
all recipients. Please "delete" or "highlight & cut" any forwarding
history which includes my email address! It is a courtesy to me and
others who may not wish to have their email addresses sent all over the
world! Erasing the history helps prevent Spammers from mining addresses
and viruses from being propagated. /
THANK YOU!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Without writing software the other guys are probably right in that a cheapActually, LinuxCNC (was EMC2) is about $300 cheaper (figure $150 for
> surplus PC with MACH is the lowest cost option. In your case even a
> laptop would work with a smooth stepper and a driver board.
Windows, $150 for Mach), I currently have installed it on a 384 MB
PII650 with a 20 GB HDD. Those are not high cost machines, and Mach
will need no less machine.
There is a learning curve with LinuxCNC, but there is also one with
Mach. If you are an experienced Mach user, and it is a commercial
application, use Mach. Your time is money. Also buy a faster machine,
a 2.2 GHz+/2GB/250 GB system is cheap enough and will save you time.
The same applies to LinuxCNC, if you are a LinuxCNC user, use it, buy a
faster PC and don't look back.
In a commercial application, a few billable hours can make or break a
project.
Dave 8{)
--
/"The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look
at the men he has around him."/
Niccolo Machiavelli
/
NOTE TO ALL:
When forwarding emails, please use only "Blind Carbon Copy" or "Bcc" for
all recipients. Please "delete" or "highlight & cut" any forwarding
history which includes my email address! It is a courtesy to me and
others who may not wish to have their email addresses sent all over the
world! Erasing the history helps prevent Spammers from mining addresses
and viruses from being propagated. /
THANK YOU!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
scyvt
2012-10-23 07:45:36 UTC
single axis control
Andy Wander
2012-10-23 07:57:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] single axis control
Roland Jollivet
2012-10-23 08:08:04 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] single axis control
John Dammeyer
2012-10-23 09:21:12 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] single axis control
Roland Jollivet
2012-10-23 09:36:41 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] single axis control
scyvt
2012-10-23 10:15:14 UTC
Re: single axis control
John Murphy
2012-10-23 11:03:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] single axis control
Rjreese29
2012-10-23 11:04:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] single axis control
Jeffrey Birt
2012-10-23 11:05:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] single axis control
John Dammeyer
2012-10-23 11:12:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: single axis control
jeremy youngs
2012-10-23 13:45:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: single axis control
jeremy youngs
2012-10-23 14:56:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] single axis control
David G. LeVine
2012-10-23 20:20:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: single axis control
Roland Jollivet
2012-10-24 04:58:21 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] single axis control
jeremy youngs
2012-10-24 14:36:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] single axis control