Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Posted by
Joe Vicars
on 2000-10-16 11:15:12 UTC
Bill,
The machine you describe is similar to an overarm router. They were used in the "old days" by the aircraft industry to rout stacks
of aluminum sheets from templates.
Yes you could get it to work, the only problem would be the software. You might have to write your own to translate x,y into dual
radial elements. Robotic arms (welders, etc.) work on this principal, so there may be software already available.
EMC might be able to do it.
However, I question your reasoning. Unless you just like doing it the hard way.
BillDarby wrote:
The machine you describe is similar to an overarm router. They were used in the "old days" by the aircraft industry to rout stacks
of aluminum sheets from templates.
Yes you could get it to work, the only problem would be the software. You might have to write your own to translate x,y into dual
radial elements. Robotic arms (welders, etc.) work on this principal, so there may be software already available.
EMC might be able to do it.
However, I question your reasoning. Unless you just like doing it the hard way.
BillDarby wrote:
> Yes, that's it. I think it would be fascinating. Just to add to that, if you could co-ordinate everything your tool post could
> also have a Z axis to position the height of the cutter/tooling to adjust, with the rotation of the part to maintain the best
> cutting height and maybe even attitude. (I am specifically thinking of turning something like a crankshaft without having to setup
> on the center of each crank throw)
>
> Just dreaming!!
>
> Thanks Jon ...... Bill D
>
> PS While I'm at it, For years I have toyed with the idea of building a mill who's X Y movement is achieved by placing the spindle
> within a large bearing race which lies itself within a larger bearing race such that all points within the area of the two might be
> reached. I would think that the quality of a line milled in any direction would be as good as can be obtained on an X Y machine.???
> (0: so long as the computer's doing the math!!!! :0)
>
> Jon Anderson wrote:
>
> > Bill,
> >
> > Live tooling changes a lot. When you said lathe, I got hung up on
> > turning. For a belt driven hobby lathe, I'd think it wouldn't be too
> > difficult to put a timing pulley on the spindle somewhere for a stepper
> > drive. Loosen the regular belt, add the timing belt to the stepper, and
> > you have in effect a hybrid horizontal mill with rotary axis.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> > Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
> >
> > Addresses:
> > Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> > Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> > URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > bill,
> > List Manager
>
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
Discussion Thread
Joe Vicars
2000-10-16 08:17:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Jon Anderson
2000-10-16 08:36:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
BillDarby
2000-10-16 08:50:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
dougrasmussen@c...
2000-10-16 09:09:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
BillDarby
2000-10-16 09:13:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
BillDarby
2000-10-16 09:22:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Jon Anderson
2000-10-16 09:36:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
dougrasmussen@c...
2000-10-16 10:32:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
BillDarby
2000-10-16 11:00:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Joe Vicars
2000-10-16 11:15:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Jon Anderson
2000-10-16 11:40:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
BillDarby
2000-10-16 12:37:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Ian Wright
2000-10-16 13:34:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Alison & Jim Gregg
2000-10-16 19:18:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
ptengin@a...
2000-10-16 19:34:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
BillDarby
2000-10-16 20:00:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-16 23:29:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
R. T. Robbins
2000-10-22 20:43:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas