Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Posted by
BillDarby
on 2000-10-16 12:37:21 UTC
Hi again Joe
You are of course speaking of the bearing within a bearing. Probably just a sucker looking for punishment. I just like thinking about
doing things in novel ways, so I thought , while I'm talking about harebrained stuff,,,, I would ask to see who else had played with the
idea.
Having a slow day. Bill D
My spell checker leads to all sorts of not very useful info: :0)
Usage Note: The first part of the compound harebrained is often misspelled hair in the belief that the meaning of the word is with a
hair-sized brain rather than with no more sense than a hare. Though hairbrained has a long history, this spelling is not established
usage.
Joe Vicars wrote:
You are of course speaking of the bearing within a bearing. Probably just a sucker looking for punishment. I just like thinking about
doing things in novel ways, so I thought , while I'm talking about harebrained stuff,,,, I would ask to see who else had played with the
idea.
Having a slow day. Bill D
My spell checker leads to all sorts of not very useful info: :0)
Usage Note: The first part of the compound harebrained is often misspelled hair in the belief that the meaning of the word is with a
hair-sized brain rather than with no more sense than a hare. Though hairbrained has a long history, this spelling is not established
usage.
Joe Vicars wrote:
> Bill,
> The machine you describe is similar to an overarm router. They were used in the "old days" by the aircraft industry to rout stacks
> of aluminum sheets from templates.
> Yes you could get it to work, the only problem would be the software. You might have to write your own to translate x,y into dual
> radial elements. Robotic arms (welders, etc.) work on this principal, so there may be software already available.
> EMC might be able to do it.
> However, I question your reasoning. Unless you just like doing it the hard way.
Discussion Thread
Joe Vicars
2000-10-16 08:17:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Jon Anderson
2000-10-16 08:36:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
BillDarby
2000-10-16 08:50:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
dougrasmussen@c...
2000-10-16 09:09:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
BillDarby
2000-10-16 09:13:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
BillDarby
2000-10-16 09:22:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Jon Anderson
2000-10-16 09:36:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
dougrasmussen@c...
2000-10-16 10:32:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
BillDarby
2000-10-16 11:00:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Joe Vicars
2000-10-16 11:15:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Jon Anderson
2000-10-16 11:40:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
BillDarby
2000-10-16 12:37:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Ian Wright
2000-10-16 13:34:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Alison & Jim Gregg
2000-10-16 19:18:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
ptengin@a...
2000-10-16 19:34:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
BillDarby
2000-10-16 20:00:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-16 23:29:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas
R. T. Robbins
2000-10-22 20:43:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]doodling with ideas