Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-11-29 12:05:43 UTC
BillDarby wrote:
problem on EMC, as the user mode Linux environment is running on a virtual
memory machine.
Actually, if these line-arc-line patterns were repeated in a regular fashion, this
could be reduced to about 50 lines in EMC, by using relative coordinates to
set over so far between inerations.
Jon
> Hi AllWell, now here's one for the EMC vs. DOS whatever wars! This wouldn't be any
>
> I recently ran a tool path with 36,000 lines of code. (no big deal in the real world) Now my question is this: This
> path was really only 200 sets of (a line an arc and a second line) or [line, arc, line, 200 times]. "If" I could have entered the
> summation of the 160 lines of code representing each arc into one common "arc command" I would have had a total of just 600 lines
> of code.
>
> As it was, there was not enough memory to edit on the CNC.
problem on EMC, as the user mode Linux environment is running on a virtual
memory machine.
Actually, if these line-arc-line patterns were repeated in a regular fashion, this
could be reduced to about 50 lines in EMC, by using relative coordinates to
set over so far between inerations.
Jon
Discussion Thread
BillDarby
2000-11-29 07:37:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Marcus & Eva
2000-11-29 08:20:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Joe Vicars
2000-11-29 08:26:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Jon Elson
2000-11-29 12:05:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
BillDarby
2000-11-29 13:00:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
BillDarby
2000-11-29 15:36:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Fred Smith
2000-11-29 16:06:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
BillDarby
2000-11-29 17:43:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
ballendo@y...
2000-11-29 17:58:16 UTC
Re: A question of size managenent.
Marcus & Eva
2000-11-29 20:27:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Fred Smith
2000-11-29 20:29:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
BillDarby
2000-11-29 20:54:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Jon Elson
2000-11-29 21:08:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Jon Elson
2000-11-29 21:40:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: A question of size managenent.
BillDarby
2000-11-29 21:57:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Jon Elson
2000-11-29 22:27:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Fred Smith
2000-11-29 22:39:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
BillDarby
2000-11-30 06:28:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Marcus & Eva
2000-11-30 08:04:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Joe Fahy
2000-11-30 08:12:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
BillDarby
2000-11-30 08:26:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Fred Smith
2000-11-30 12:02:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
Fred Smith
2000-11-30 12:17:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
BillDarby
2000-11-30 12:38:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.
ballendo@y...
2000-11-30 20:36:20 UTC
Re: A question of size managenent.
Marcus & Eva
2000-11-30 20:59:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.