CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2000-11-29 21:08:23 UTC
BillDarby wrote:

> Jon Elson wrote:
> > Actually, if these line-arc-line patterns were repeated in a regular fashion, this
> > could be reduced to about 50 lines in EMC, by using relative coordinates to
> > set over so far between inerations.
>
> Thanks Jon
>
> The path was a series of ever diminishing "U"s that when viewed from the top end of the Us formed a convex radius on the part. (don't know
> if even the Lord himself could understand what I just said) <BG> [each path was inside the preceding U shaped path and at a little higher
> Z.]

Well, you could actually do this in a fairly short program with EMC.
I am hoping that there will be some more sophisticated features
added, such as do loops and if-then-else. But, I think that EMC
has the features so that a program to do this kind of thing could be
written. It would take a number of variables to do it, but there are
plenty available. It can do arithmetic expressions, such as
[#1000 = #1001 * 5.432 + #1003] and then use these variables
in the move commands, like G01 X#1000 Y#1001 so that
the same program block can do different things each time it is
called. I have used it to write extremely simple stuff that drills
holes with a fancy peck cycle at a number of locations. But, it
could do more complex things.

I have something like this done with the 'winskin' surface machining
feature of Bobcad/CAM, and it did not do a great job where the
curved part met the flat surface. it was good enough for the part
I was making, though.

Jon

Discussion Thread

BillDarby 2000-11-29 07:37:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Marcus & Eva 2000-11-29 08:20:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Joe Vicars 2000-11-29 08:26:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Jon Elson 2000-11-29 12:05:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. BillDarby 2000-11-29 13:00:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. BillDarby 2000-11-29 15:36:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Fred Smith 2000-11-29 16:06:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. BillDarby 2000-11-29 17:43:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. ballendo@y... 2000-11-29 17:58:16 UTC Re: A question of size managenent. Marcus & Eva 2000-11-29 20:27:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Fred Smith 2000-11-29 20:29:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. BillDarby 2000-11-29 20:54:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Jon Elson 2000-11-29 21:08:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Jon Elson 2000-11-29 21:40:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: A question of size managenent. BillDarby 2000-11-29 21:57:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Jon Elson 2000-11-29 22:27:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Fred Smith 2000-11-29 22:39:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. BillDarby 2000-11-30 06:28:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Marcus & Eva 2000-11-30 08:04:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Joe Fahy 2000-11-30 08:12:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. BillDarby 2000-11-30 08:26:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Fred Smith 2000-11-30 12:02:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. Fred Smith 2000-11-30 12:17:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. BillDarby 2000-11-30 12:38:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent. ballendo@y... 2000-11-30 20:36:20 UTC Re: A question of size managenent. Marcus & Eva 2000-11-30 20:59:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]A question of size managenent.