Re:Bobcad 17
Posted by
Wally K
on 2000-12-04 06:54:03 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, "James Owens" <wotisname@l...>
wrote:
seamless manner. And these are not a export from acad to a import
to xxxcam.
And do you know if these programs work with the free acad clones on
the net.
Wally K.
wrote:
>the
> I, for one, am a user of ACAD14 and 2000 and have been looking into
> add-in CAM packages that retail for about $250 all in. I have seenthem at
> ten times this price but I can't justify the huge price hike inwhat the
> software offers. I have asked on this list if anyone else haslooked at this
> route but haven't had one reply, it may be that I use the wrongafter-shave
> or that I am in a majority of one.Are you saying there are CAM programs that integrate into acad in a
>
> Terry
seamless manner. And these are not a export from acad to a import
to xxxcam.
And do you know if these programs work with the free acad clones on
the net.
Wally K.
Discussion Thread
John Stevenson
2000-12-04 05:34:05 UTC
Re:Bobcad 17
James Owens
2000-12-04 06:26:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17
Fred Smith
2000-12-04 06:30:18 UTC
Re:Bobcad 17
Smoke
2000-12-04 06:33:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17
Smoke
2000-12-04 06:42:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17
Wally K
2000-12-04 06:54:03 UTC
Re:Bobcad 17
Jon Anderson
2000-12-04 07:23:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17
machines@n...
2000-12-04 11:13:15 UTC
Re:Bobcad 17
James Owens
2000-12-04 14:05:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17
James Owens
2000-12-04 14:05:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17
James Owens
2000-12-04 14:06:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17
Smoke
2000-12-04 14:14:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17