CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17

Posted by James Owens
on 2000-12-04 06:26:44 UTC
Hi John,

Might I point out to the list that you are a small commercial concern
working in England. That aside, I would be very interested in the packages
you use and the way you use them. Please don't worry about the sales pitch
as I know you are not in the business of selling the software.

I, for one, am a user of ACAD14 and 2000 and have been looking into the
add-in CAM packages that retail for about $250 all in. I have seen them at
ten times this price but I can't justify the huge price hike in what the
software offers. I have asked on this list if anyone else has looked at this
route but haven't had one reply, it may be that I use the wrong after-shave
or that I am in a majority of one.

Terry


> I've read the previous posts with interest.
> By far the most interesting is Fred Smiths response. He makes some good
> points even though it's a thinly disguised sales pitch for Vector.Not
> knocking Fred as he has done a lot to help this group.

Discussion Thread

John Stevenson 2000-12-04 05:34:05 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 James Owens 2000-12-04 06:26:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 Fred Smith 2000-12-04 06:30:18 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 Smoke 2000-12-04 06:33:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 Smoke 2000-12-04 06:42:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 Wally K 2000-12-04 06:54:03 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 Jon Anderson 2000-12-04 07:23:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 machines@n... 2000-12-04 11:13:15 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 James Owens 2000-12-04 14:05:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 James Owens 2000-12-04 14:05:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 James Owens 2000-12-04 14:06:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 Smoke 2000-12-04 14:14:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17