CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 Review

Posted by Smoke
on 2000-12-04 15:02:42 UTC
You are CORRECT about the copyright Fred! But it still doesn't hurt to
place a notice on the web site. Easiest way to do this is by placing it in
the section where the webmaster information is. That way when ever there
are changes, thecopyright notice doesn't have to change.

Smoke

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Smith <imserv@...>
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com>
Date: Monday, December 04, 2000 3:52 PM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 Review


>>
>> Fred if you check the link that you posted in public domain. You
>> will see there is no copywrite expressed or implied.
>>
>> http://209.69.202.197/cadcamedmdro.html
>>
>
>Check the bottom of the page, refresh if necessary. Public posting
>of URL's does NOT imply that the links so specified are public
>domain. In fact unless web contents are specifically stated to be
>public domain I believe the copyright laws apply. If nothing else one
>would expect that common courtesy would dictate that you at least ASK
>first to receive permission before posting what is obviously not
>yours to divulge.
>
>>
>> I was not privy to those discusions. And you have made no effort
>to
>> make those conversations known. But i understand your wishes now
>and
>> will do my best to comply.
>>
>
>Thank you.
>
>>
>> Major confusion. when you leave multiple posts about Vector-Cam
>> capabilitys. Why can't i ask questions. That is what this list is
>> for.
>>
>
>My comments are generally to correct misconceptions or misleading
>information about the products that I sell and use. While I am a
>seller, I am also an avid hobbyist and get deeply involved in the
>craft and in development of new solutions to CNC related problems. I
>have no problems answering questions about Vector on a general level,
>or to correct erroneous statements. However this is not the proper
>forum for product support related questions. IMService maintains an
>extensive forum for that purpose and discussions of the nitty gritty
>how to of Vector should be done there , not here where there are
>nearly 1000 people many of whom may not have the slightest interest.
>
>You are free to ask questions, as I and others are free to answer you
>or not, or to point you to possible sources for the answers that you
>seek.
>
>With respect to DDE, It stands for Dynamic Data Exchange, it is a
>windows, interprocess communication protocol, it was developed before
>COM. I would suggest the following reference for more detailed
>information:
>
>http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?
>URL=/library/psdk/winbase/dde_4oit.htm
>
>The Vector program has been set up to be a DDE server, which means
>that you will be able to write a program in an external language ,
>such as VB, C, Delphi, Powerbasic, VBA in spreadsheets, data
>base, or any program that can function as a DDE client and control
>the menus and drawing functions of Vector.
>
>This tool is expected to be able to provide extensive part family
>programming, and development of complex/custom drawing applications
>that can today be accomplished with only data import activities,
>using the Point-Line-Circle (PLC). Vfontz and Vcarvz both use the
>PLC format, to send tool path geometry to Vector. The DDE is
>expected to be able to provide more direct control over the Vector
>functions. It can be somewhat likened to Lisp in Autocad or the basic
>script language in DesignCad, or the VBA interface in Turbocad. The
>appearance of one of these DDE processes happening is that of the
>invisible man operating Vector, at very high speed. By changing a
>value in a spread-sheet, a new and different or unique part drawing
>could be generated in Vector.
>
>This option should be released within the next month or so. It is
>presently in Beta testing. Pricing has not been established, nor have
>the CAM interaction capabilities, if any.
>
>
>
>
>Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
>Addresses:
>Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
>Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
>URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>bill,
>List Manager
>
>
>

Discussion Thread

ballendo@y... 2000-12-03 05:14:13 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated jmw@c... 2000-12-03 05:23:08 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated ballendo@y... 2000-12-03 06:20:25 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated Mariss Freimanis 2000-12-03 09:11:04 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated Wally K 2000-12-03 09:57:11 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated and Zener selection Mariss Freimanis 2000-12-03 11:24:21 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated and Zener selection Wally K 2000-12-03 11:32:21 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated and Zener selection Mariss Freimanis 2000-12-03 11:40:39 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated and Zener selection Mike 2000-12-03 11:41:45 UTC Bobcad 17 Review Wally K 2000-12-03 12:13:58 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated and Zener selection Smoke 2000-12-03 12:19:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bobcad 17 Review Mike 2000-12-03 13:32:39 UTC Re: Bobcad 17 Review Smoke 2000-12-03 13:46:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bobcad 17 Review ballendo@y... 2000-12-03 14:54:57 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated Mike 2000-12-03 15:43:48 UTC Re: Bobcad 17 Review Mariss Freimanis 2000-12-03 17:06:46 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated and Zener selection Mariss Freimanis 2000-12-03 17:17:40 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated ptengin@a... 2000-12-03 19:36:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bobcad 17 Review Mike 2000-12-03 21:00:13 UTC Re: Bobcad 17 Review Tim Goldstein 2000-12-03 22:56:56 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bobcad 17 Review Fred Smith 2000-12-04 03:39:56 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 Review ballendo@y... 2000-12-04 03:52:05 UTC re:Re: Bobcad 17 Review Smoke 2000-12-04 06:28:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 Review Fred Smith 2000-12-04 06:43:54 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 Review Smoke 2000-12-04 06:54:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 Review Wally K 2000-12-04 07:17:58 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 Review Tim Goldstein 2000-12-04 08:17:35 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 Review Fred Smith 2000-12-04 08:30:46 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 Review Mike 2000-12-04 10:36:06 UTC Re: Bobcad 17 Review Wally K 2000-12-04 12:32:40 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 Review Steve Greenfield 2000-12-04 13:40:30 UTC Re: Stepper power supplies, unregulated and Zener selection Fred Smith 2000-12-04 14:52:30 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 Review Smoke 2000-12-04 15:02:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Bobcad 17 Review Wally K 2000-12-04 15:40:58 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 Review James Owens 2000-12-04 15:46:39 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 Review Fred Smith 2000-12-04 18:29:14 UTC Re:Bobcad 17 Review