RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
Posted by
Carlos Guillermo
on 2000-12-08 13:18:23 UTC
Phil -
I realize the tone of my post was a little jumpy; I apologize if I
offended you.
I did follow the discussion you mentioned, and my initial feeling
was that it seems every time this discussion comes up in this
group, the "consensus" shifts. Maybe this is because there is so
much diversity that some are compelled to just sum it up for
others. I'm guilty of this sometimes. My point was that we all
have different perceptions of what the box should be doing, why
not just pick a commercially available complete and cohesive
solution, and "emulate" it. This, at the least, would help people
research and understand the proposed system based on real-world
demonstrated performance, and hopefully avoid the ramifications of
"design by committee".
Carlos Guillermo
VERVE Engineering & Design
-----Original Message-----
From: PhilC [mailto:phil@...]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 3:47 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
I realize the tone of my post was a little jumpy; I apologize if I
offended you.
I did follow the discussion you mentioned, and my initial feeling
was that it seems every time this discussion comes up in this
group, the "consensus" shifts. Maybe this is because there is so
much diversity that some are compelled to just sum it up for
others. I'm guilty of this sometimes. My point was that we all
have different perceptions of what the box should be doing, why
not just pick a commercially available complete and cohesive
solution, and "emulate" it. This, at the least, would help people
research and understand the proposed system based on real-world
demonstrated performance, and hopefully avoid the ramifications of
"design by committee".
Carlos Guillermo
VERVE Engineering & Design
-----Original Message-----
From: PhilC [mailto:phil@...]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 3:47 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carlos Guillermo" <carlos@...>
<snip>
>I believe I've heard several people
> here wish there was an equivalent to Flashcut's box.
> BTW, I'm impressed that you know what "most" people here are
> thinking when we say "black box". It seems to me that figuring
> out what people are thinking is what this whole discussion is
> about.
> Carlos
Earlier on the subject of the pulse generator I suggested that the
interpolation should be handled in the "Black Box". There was
some
disagreement on where the motion calculations should be done - in
the PC or
the Box. The argument that was made is that the "Black Box"
should be as
simple as possible. I was referring to that discussion, go back
and read it
before you jump on me because you think I was somehow critical of
your
message.
Phil
Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
Addresses:
Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
bill,
List Manager
Discussion Thread
ron ginger
2000-12-07 19:00:26 UTC
Signal gen Interface
Jeff Barlow
2000-12-07 19:12:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Signal gen Interface
Wally K
2000-12-07 19:54:28 UTC
Re: Signal gen Interface
Jeff Barlow
2000-12-07 20:16:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
John D. Guenther
2000-12-08 07:42:13 UTC
Re: Signal gen Interface
Carlos Guillermo
2000-12-08 10:26:29 UTC
Re: Signal gen Interface
Greg Nuspel
2000-12-08 10:40:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
PhilC
2000-12-08 10:51:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
Carlos Guillermo
2000-12-08 12:10:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
PhilC
2000-12-08 12:47:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
Carlos Guillermo
2000-12-08 13:18:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
Jeff Barlow
2000-12-08 14:21:30 UTC
Re: Signal gen Interface
Jeff Barlow
2000-12-08 14:26:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
Greg Nuspel
2000-12-08 14:38:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
Jeff Barlow
2000-12-08 15:01:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
Jon Elson
2000-12-08 16:03:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
Brian Pitt
2000-12-08 22:03:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Signal gen Interface
ballendo@y...
2000-12-09 17:05:43 UTC
Re: Signal gen Interface
ballendo@y...
2000-12-09 18:05:42 UTC
Re: Signal gen Interface
ballendo@y...
2000-12-09 18:22:55 UTC
Re: Re: Signal gen Interface
PhilC
2000-12-09 18:29:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Signal gen Interface
JanRwl@A...
2000-12-09 19:07:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Signal gen Interface
ballendo@y...
2000-12-09 23:06:35 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Signal gen Interface