CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: stripped distribution for emc

Posted by r_fl_z@h...
on 2000-12-30 03:02:07 UTC
Paul:

That sounds very interesting. What is your motivation to base your
install on RH6.2? Or is that a typo? I've been led to believe that
5.2 was the "most stable" version for EMC use.

Ron


--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, Paul Corner <Paul.Corner@t...>
wrote:
>
> Hi Ron
>
> With some spare time to kill at work, I've been working on
a 'Brain Dead
> Install' based around RedHat 6.2. The kernel is pre-patched and
compiled for
> general IDE, network, and pentium type of machines. Just need to
compile the
> August-11 EMC release and build an RPM. Along with writing a couple
of help
> files and beta testing the disks, It shouldn't be too long - Just
give me a
> couple of weeks or so. February is my target date, that gives me
time to burn
> a stack ready for NAMES.
>
> Current spec is :-
> 2.2.17 kernel with rtlinux-3.0 pre-patched and compiled - NOT the
RH supplied
> one, but a virgin source.
> 2.4.0 & rtl-3.0 beta test RPM included (from rtlinux.org).
> ALL emc source and pre compiled binaries.
> The compilers and libraries required to recompile all the source
code.
> XFree86 4.0
> KDE version 2
> The basic linux tools - ftp, pppd, mc mtools etc.
>
> But no games, ofiice software, or other gimicks such as sound.
>
> IF there is more that sould be included, please let me know, But
there is a
> limit - I need to fit it all on to one disk.
> Finally, I will not be putting an ISO image on a web site - the
connection
> time to upload it would take most of the weekend. Perhaps a web
master would
> do it from a CD.
>
> Regards, Paul.
>
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, r_fl_z@h... wrote:
> > Greetings:
> > After several failed attempts to install Linux 5.2 with kernel
update
> > and RT patch (on a clean machine), I would LOVE to see a cd
produced
> > as described below. For what it's worth, I am computer literate
but
> > a newbie to Linux, and I've found the process to be unworkable.
I
> > have yet to give up on it, but I do think the installation
process
> > stands as a barrier to EMC's acceptance.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ron

Discussion Thread

Lawrence Glaister 2000-12-28 09:34:52 UTC stripped distribution for emc r_fl_z@h... 2000-12-29 04:03:22 UTC Re: stripped distribution for emc Tim Goldstein 2000-12-29 06:18:19 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stripped distribution for emc Paul Corner 2000-12-29 11:43:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stripped distribution for emc Doug Fortune 2000-12-29 13:18:56 UTC stripped distribution for emc r_fl_z@h... 2000-12-30 02:53:38 UTC Re: stripped distribution for emc r_fl_z@h... 2000-12-30 03:02:07 UTC Re: stripped distribution for emc Robert Allen & Marsha Camp 2000-12-30 05:24:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stripped distribution for emc Paul Corner 2000-12-30 12:41:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stripped distribution for emc