CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stripped distribution for emc

Posted by Paul Corner
on 2000-12-30 12:41:32 UTC
HI Ron

No, not a typo, I did say version six.

My main reason for using the newer version is for the newer libs and a
graphical installer. RH 5.2 is rather old hat now (pun intended), and with
most of the current development work on EMC being done with the 2.2.xx kernel,
it is as well to keep the linux distro up to date.

Regards, Paul.


.. With a clean
kernel source from linux.org, I would expect the 2.2.17 kernel to be just as
stable

On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, r_fl_z@... wrote:
> That sounds very interesting. What is your motivation to base your
> install on RH6.2? Or is that a typo? I've been led to believe that
> 5.2 was the "most stable" version for EMC use.

Discussion Thread

Lawrence Glaister 2000-12-28 09:34:52 UTC stripped distribution for emc r_fl_z@h... 2000-12-29 04:03:22 UTC Re: stripped distribution for emc Tim Goldstein 2000-12-29 06:18:19 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stripped distribution for emc Paul Corner 2000-12-29 11:43:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stripped distribution for emc Doug Fortune 2000-12-29 13:18:56 UTC stripped distribution for emc r_fl_z@h... 2000-12-30 02:53:38 UTC Re: stripped distribution for emc r_fl_z@h... 2000-12-30 03:02:07 UTC Re: stripped distribution for emc Robert Allen & Marsha Camp 2000-12-30 05:24:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stripped distribution for emc Paul Corner 2000-12-30 12:41:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stripped distribution for emc