Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
Posted by
Smoke
on 2001-01-13 15:19:10 UTC
It appears to me your saying a drawing for a part should not have any
tolerance at all Bill.
Is that what you mean to convey...or did I mis-read something there?
From an engineering standpoint there are very good reasons for using a
nominal dimension and then adding a plus or minus (as required) tolerance on
the part.
Smoke
Typically, they
tolerance at all Bill.
Is that what you mean to convey...or did I mis-read something there?
From an engineering standpoint there are very good reasons for using a
nominal dimension and then adding a plus or minus (as required) tolerance on
the part.
Smoke
Typically, they
>would draw something at 3 inches and then they would
>manually dimension the print with a 3 inch plus 0 minus .010
>tolerance While some will say that this is not a problem, it
>is when you are machining the parts from the model files
>sometimes weeks before drawing files are actually created.
>
Discussion Thread
Joe Vicars
2001-01-11 12:09:12 UTC
programming by hand
dougrasmussen@c...
2001-01-11 13:35:36 UTC
Re: programming by hand
Joe Vicars
2001-01-11 14:06:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: programming by hand
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-11 14:42:22 UTC
Re: programming by hand
diazden
2001-01-11 16:09:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: programming by hand
wanliker@a...
2001-01-11 16:10:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: programming by hand
ballendo@y...
2001-01-11 16:54:10 UTC
re:Re: programming by hand
Marcus & Eva
2001-01-11 21:55:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-11 22:12:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: programming by hand
Jon Elson
2001-01-11 22:13:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] programming by hand
Fred Smith
2001-01-12 07:15:53 UTC
Re: re:Re: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-12 09:43:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:Re: programming by hand
ballendo@y...
2001-01-12 20:24:06 UTC
re: rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
dougrasmussen@c...
2001-01-12 21:35:28 UTC
rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
Jon Anderson
2001-01-12 22:06:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-12 22:16:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-12 22:18:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
diazden
2001-01-13 01:06:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:Re: programming by hand
ballendo@y...
2001-01-13 02:29:22 UTC
Re: Re: re:Re: programming by hand
Bill Griffin
2001-01-13 08:30:10 UTC
rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
dougrasmussen@c...
2001-01-13 10:13:48 UTC
rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
ballendo@y...
2001-01-13 14:13:25 UTC
rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-13 14:55:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:Re: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-13 15:19:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
Alvaro Fogassa
2001-01-13 15:28:48 UTC
Re: programming by hand
ballendo@y...
2001-01-13 15:37:03 UTC
Re: Re: re:Re: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-13 15:50:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: re:Re: programming by hand
ballendo@y...
2001-01-13 16:02:19 UTC
Re: rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
diazden
2001-01-14 00:17:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
dave engvall
2001-01-14 10:25:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: re:Re: programming by hand
Bill Griffin
2001-01-15 09:32:25 UTC
re: rE:Re:RE: programming by hand