Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: programming by hand
Posted by
diazden
on 2001-01-11 16:09:56 UTC
Joe:
some years ago when the machine were I work got the controller replaced they
put on the latest (at the time) fanuc om10 with conversational controller
can you believe that I have not used it to make more than 2 parts on all this
years? the problem is that on my opinion if you learn gcode before conversational
programming it is very hard to adapt to a system that is a bastard to follow and edit
Just my opinion but I like to take control of what the machine is doing
regards mariano
Joe Vicars wrote:
some years ago when the machine were I work got the controller replaced they
put on the latest (at the time) fanuc om10 with conversational controller
can you believe that I have not used it to make more than 2 parts on all this
years? the problem is that on my opinion if you learn gcode before conversational
programming it is very hard to adapt to a system that is a bastard to follow and edit
Just my opinion but I like to take control of what the machine is doing
regards mariano
Joe Vicars wrote:
> Sorry Doug I wasn't clear enough.
> The person I was responding to was talking about entering G-Code as text, line by line. You're talking about conversational at the
> machine control.
> I agree, conversational can be a real time saver.
> Only problem being that most of the inexpensive controllers don't have conversational. This was a really long thread about 2 months
> back about nobody offering an affordable conversational package.
>
> dougrasmussen@... wrote:
>
> > Joe,
> >
> > No so sure I totally agree with you. Probably 98% of our programming
> > for my 4 cnc's is done on the shop floor. I like to think we're
> > pretty efficient. Most of our work is close tolerance prototype
> > stuff.
> >
> > Given the modern graphical controllers with a good assortment of
> > canned cycles, the need for CAM is diminished. Don't forget it's the
> > exception to run into a part which is not made up of a few
> > rudimentary shapes which can easily be handled by canned cycles.
> >
> > There's some great advantages of using the control's canned cycles
> > also. It's very easy to modify the program (usually just one line of
> > code to completely program a rectangular pocket including step
> > milling, corner radius spec, plus a finishing pass, for example...
> > that could easily equal 50+ lines of code from a CAM system), but one
> > of the biggest advantages is the canned cycles use cutter radius
> > compensation. So, if for whatever reason a feature does not come out
> > on size it's easy to change it slightly by changing the cutter
> > diameter in the tool offset table. Try that with a CAM generated
> > program.
> >
> > And, yes, everyone will need a CAM system at some point. Irregular
> > pockets are difficult using canned cycles. But, I think their need
> > is overrated. On the other hand a CAD system is a must.
> >
> > Oh, yeah, here's another reason in favor of hand programming....you
> > get to cut the parts the way you want not the way the CAM system
> > wants.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, Joe Vicars <jvicars@c...> wrote:
> > > It would only take about 40 hours of writing G-code "by hand" to
> > offset
> > > the cost of a decent CAM package. That's about 2000 bucks at
> > average
> > > billing rates.
> > > Anything but the most rudimentary code writing would quickly run
> > into
> > > labor cost that would far outweigh the cost of CAM.
> > > If your controller won't take a floppy or RS232 or whatever then
> > that is
> > > another matter, but then you probably need to upgrade the control.
> > The
> > > same amortization would apply to the control upgrade.
> > > It just depends on how you cost out your time. Most hobbyists don't
> > > bill their time as money, so a few hours of code writing is cheaper
> > than
> > > 500 bucks cash money.
> > > Still, it is awfully inefficient with all the stuff available.
> > > My $.02
> >
> > Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
> >
> > Addresses:
> > Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> > Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> > URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > bill,
> > List Manager
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
Discussion Thread
Joe Vicars
2001-01-11 12:09:12 UTC
programming by hand
dougrasmussen@c...
2001-01-11 13:35:36 UTC
Re: programming by hand
Joe Vicars
2001-01-11 14:06:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: programming by hand
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-11 14:42:22 UTC
Re: programming by hand
diazden
2001-01-11 16:09:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: programming by hand
wanliker@a...
2001-01-11 16:10:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: programming by hand
ballendo@y...
2001-01-11 16:54:10 UTC
re:Re: programming by hand
Marcus & Eva
2001-01-11 21:55:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-11 22:12:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: programming by hand
Jon Elson
2001-01-11 22:13:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] programming by hand
Fred Smith
2001-01-12 07:15:53 UTC
Re: re:Re: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-12 09:43:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:Re: programming by hand
ballendo@y...
2001-01-12 20:24:06 UTC
re: rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
dougrasmussen@c...
2001-01-12 21:35:28 UTC
rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
Jon Anderson
2001-01-12 22:06:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-12 22:16:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-12 22:18:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
diazden
2001-01-13 01:06:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:Re: programming by hand
ballendo@y...
2001-01-13 02:29:22 UTC
Re: Re: re:Re: programming by hand
Bill Griffin
2001-01-13 08:30:10 UTC
rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
dougrasmussen@c...
2001-01-13 10:13:48 UTC
rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
ballendo@y...
2001-01-13 14:13:25 UTC
rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-13 14:55:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:Re: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-13 15:19:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
Alvaro Fogassa
2001-01-13 15:28:48 UTC
Re: programming by hand
ballendo@y...
2001-01-13 15:37:03 UTC
Re: Re: re:Re: programming by hand
Smoke
2001-01-13 15:50:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: re:Re: programming by hand
ballendo@y...
2001-01-13 16:02:19 UTC
Re: rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
diazden
2001-01-14 00:17:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: rE:Re:RE: programming by hand
dave engvall
2001-01-14 10:25:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: re:Re: programming by hand
Bill Griffin
2001-01-15 09:32:25 UTC
re: rE:Re:RE: programming by hand