Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Helical Couplings
Posted by
Smoke
on 2001-02-17 18:08:40 UTC
I'd have to disagree Doug.
I've got some catalogs here at home that list helical slit type couplings as
having ZERO backlash.
I suppose if they are made strong enough that would be true....which
indicates to me, you might as well just use a solid coupling.
Smoke
I've got some catalogs here at home that list helical slit type couplings as
having ZERO backlash.
I suppose if they are made strong enough that would be true....which
indicates to me, you might as well just use a solid coupling.
Smoke
>Bill,discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
>It's my impression that helical couplings are not the best for use in
>a precision machine. I notice the listing in my McMaster catalog
>says "with little wind-up or backlash". Doesn't that imply they
>have wind-up & backlash?
>
>How about the bellows type, they are listed as "no backlash". Of
>course, they cost more than 2X as much.
>
>This coupling problem is one reason I feel a number of manufacturers
>use a cog belted arrangement. I don't recall ever looking at the
>couplers on any large production CNC's to see what they're using. Do
>you know?
>
>thanks,
>
>Doug
>
>
>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "William Scalione" <wscalione@n...>
>wrote:
>> Anybody here have any 1/2" helical couplings in their junk box they
>want to sell?
>> I figured I would ask here before I spend the big bucks for new
>ones. Please
>> contact me ____OFF LIST____ at scalion@d... Thanks.
>>
>> ps. these are needed for servo motors, I got running with gecko
>G340 drives. If
>> anyone is considering stepper motors, I would strongly suggest
>using servos instead.
>> They are much smoother with no missed steps common with steppers.
>The drives
>> are cheap enough for the step and direction servo drives and the
>motors can be
>> had for a lot less than stepper motors of comparable size on ebay.
>I can get 350
>> inches per min on my machine now, and I haven't even tuned the
>drives yet. This
>> is much better than I could get with steppers, and I had good
>Compumotor 175V
>> S drives microstepped to 1000 ppr. Thanks Marriss for the great
>drive.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
>
>Addresses:
>Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
>Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
>URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>bill,
>List Manager
>
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>
>
Discussion Thread
William Scalione
2001-02-17 09:03:20 UTC
Helical Couplings
Brian Pitt
2001-02-17 13:38:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helical Couplings
William Scalione
2001-02-17 14:41:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helical Couplings
Brian Pitt
2001-02-17 15:01:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helical Couplings
Smoke
2001-02-17 17:57:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helical Couplings
dougrasmussen@c...
2001-02-17 17:59:30 UTC
Re: Helical Couplings
Smoke
2001-02-17 18:08:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Helical Couplings
Jon Anderson
2001-02-17 18:29:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Helical Couplings
Les Watts
2001-02-17 18:41:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Helical Couplings
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-02-17 19:03:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Helical Couplings
Greg Jackson
2001-02-17 21:27:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helical Couplings
Smoke
2001-02-18 10:55:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Helical Couplings
carlcnc@s...
2001-02-18 12:03:17 UTC
Re: Helical Couplings
Greg Jackson
2001-02-18 12:05:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Helical Couplings
ballendo@y...
2001-02-18 17:41:46 UTC
Re: Helical Couplings
Greg Jackson
2001-02-18 19:19:31 UTC
torque mounts (was Re: Helical Couplings)
thomasm923@a...
2001-02-18 20:35:24 UTC
Re: Helical Couplings - whaddabout...