CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] TTL 101 was Re: troubleshooting help

on 2002-02-19 06:57:42 UTC
Ballendo,

Yes I'm aware the actual voltages are not 0 and 5 but just used
those to state my question. Probably should have used the terms
'high or low' instead.

Thanks for everone's input. My goal is to come-up with some dro
software which will run on a loptop with the old 'standard' p-port
by using the status pins is input. Lindsay's software would work
if the code could be changed to look at the status pins instead
of the data pins.

I'm not a C++ programer so it is a little beyond my capabilities.

Bob


At 12:39 PM 2/19/02 -0000, you wrote:
>Bob,
>
>Although many are saying 0v and 5v, that is not "really" correct.
>
>What TTL** WILL guarantee is that a logic "0"(Lo) will be LESS
>than .8v and a logic "1"(HI) will be MORE than 2.4v
>
>I know that Jon, Alan, and the other electronics guys know this
>already. We casually speak of 0 and 5v(knowing the "truth"), but
>since many on this list do NOT know already; and may be using a meter
>to "check", I thought it would be worth mentioning...
>
>Many times a "measured"(typical) HI will be about 3.3v, and a
>measured Lo about .4v...
>
>**Transistor-Transistor-Logic. The basis for the original IBM PC
>parallel port circuitry. Nowadays the ports use different electronic
>means to accomplish the same ends results.
>
>Hope this helps.
>
>Ballendo
>

Discussion Thread

Rick Miller 2002-02-17 19:27:45 UTC troubleshooting help aspaguy 2002-02-17 19:46:59 UTC Re: troubleshooting help Rick Miller 2002-02-17 20:37:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: troubleshooting help mariss92705 2002-02-17 20:51:47 UTC Re: troubleshooting help Rick Miller 2002-02-17 21:16:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: troubleshooting help Rick Miller 2002-02-17 21:28:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: troubleshooting help mariss92705 2002-02-17 21:29:42 UTC Re: troubleshooting help mariss92705 2002-02-17 21:58:58 UTC Re: troubleshooting help Rick Miller 2002-02-17 22:11:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: troubleshooting help ballendo 2002-02-18 02:35:07 UTC P-port 101 was Re: troubleshooting help Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-18 12:49:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] troubleshooting help Bob Bachman 2002-02-18 15:52:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] troubleshooting help Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-02-18 17:45:25 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] troubleshooting help Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-02-18 17:53:29 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] troubleshooting help Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-18 18:00:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] troubleshooting help dkowalcz2000 2002-02-18 18:55:13 UTC Re: troubleshooting help Bob Bachman 2002-02-18 19:12:34 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] troubleshooting help Jon Elson 2002-02-18 20:11:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] troubleshooting help Rick Miller 2002-02-18 20:13:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: troubleshooting help Rick Miller 2002-02-18 21:14:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: troubleshooting help ballendo 2002-02-19 02:35:16 UTC more p-port 101 was Re: troubleshooting help ballendo 2002-02-19 04:01:49 UTC p-port alternative 8255PPI was Re: troubleshooting help ballendo 2002-02-19 04:39:13 UTC TTL 101 was Re: troubleshooting help Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-02-19 05:44:14 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] p-port alternative 8255PPI was Re: troubleshooting help ballendo 2002-02-19 06:32:49 UTC p-port alternative 8255PPI Robert Bachman 2002-02-19 06:57:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] TTL 101 was Re: troubleshooting help David Goodfellow 2002-02-19 08:37:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] p-port alternative 8255PPI was Re: troubleshooting help Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-02-19 09:22:22 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] p-port alternative 8255PPI Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-19 10:48:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] troubleshooting help Bill Vance 2002-02-19 11:04:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] TTL 101 was Re: troubleshooting help Bob Bachman 2002-02-19 11:24:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] TTL 101 was Re: troubleshooting help Paul 2002-02-19 12:00:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] p-port alternative 8255PPI Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-19 12:24:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] TTL 101 was Re: troubleshooting help Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-19 12:42:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] p-port alternative 8255PPI wanliker@a... 2002-02-19 13:36:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] TTL 101 was Re: troubleshooting help Vajk Fekete 2002-02-19 14:24:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] p-port alternative 8255PPI Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-19 16:06:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] p-port alternative 8255PPI Ian W. Wright 2002-02-19 16:35:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] TTL 101 was Re: troubleshooting help