Re: several items concerning the archives.
Posted by
ron ginger
on 2002-02-26 18:09:01 UTC
From: wanliker@....
now they will be asking for money to host this. I am very happy to hear
an archive exists off of Yahoo. If yahoo wants to our entire site could
dissappear in an instant. Remember the "dot bombs" of last year. A lot
of much bigger companies have gone.
under $50 per month. They own and manage all the hardware. They could
also go bust, but then we could just move to another host as long as we
owned the domainanme.
level, and just direct people that find that to the new site.
viable. We have over 2000 users, at $20 per year thats $40,000 that
could cover a lot of time. Im sure we would loose a few people that just
subscribe because its free, but there is the basis of a small business
here. And there could also be by-products, like selling a quarterly CD
archive, or maybe even printed material.
So, there is a nice business outline for someone, who will step forward
to do it?
ron ginger
>Changing to a separate server has been discussed before, and it was decidedYes, but Yahoos faults are increasing rapidly, and I suspect real soon
>that even with Yahoo's faults there are advantages.
now they will be asking for money to host this. I am very happy to hear
an archive exists off of Yahoo. If yahoo wants to our entire site could
dissappear in an instant. Remember the "dot bombs" of last year. A lot
of much bigger companies have gone.
>1. If we go to a separate server we could lose everything in the event ofThere are many web hosing companies around that would run this group for
>that persons inability, or unwillingness to continue to host it. Or any
>other problems like getting flamed like I have been in the past.
under $50 per month. They own and manage all the hardware. They could
also go bust, but then we could just move to another host as long as we
owned the domainanme.
>2. There are links all over the Internet now pointing to Yahoo, we would loseSure, so we leave the group on Yahoo as long as they last, at a minum
>these, and that would limit the ability of a lot of people to find the group.
> Heck even Google.Com finds us.
level, and just direct people that find that to the new site.
>I am getting older, so I have two individuals that can take over in the eventIf someone wanted to run this as a part time busineess it could be very
>of my inability to continue to run the list. I want the list to continue on
>independent of me.
>I doubt that we can guarantee the list continuing with a server ran by
>someone that was not completely dedicated. I have over the years seen
>several groups disappear.
viable. We have over 2000 users, at $20 per year thats $40,000 that
could cover a lot of time. Im sure we would loose a few people that just
subscribe because its free, but there is the basis of a small business
here. And there could also be by-products, like selling a quarterly CD
archive, or maybe even printed material.
So, there is a nice business outline for someone, who will step forward
to do it?
ron ginger
Discussion Thread
terrylr@b...
2002-02-26 00:11:30 UTC
several items concerning the archives.
Ian W. Wright
2002-02-26 02:45:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] several items concerning the archives.
dave_ace_me
2002-02-26 03:59:45 UTC
Re: several items concerning the archives.
Dave Lantz
2002-02-26 05:46:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: several items concerning the archives.
Paul Amaranth
2002-02-26 05:49:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: several items concerning the archives.
CL
2002-02-26 10:30:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] several items concerning the archives.
Guy Sirois
2002-02-26 12:57:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] several items concerning the archives.
glee@i...
2002-02-26 13:08:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] several items concerning the archives.
n4onl
2002-02-26 16:32:54 UTC
Re: several items concerning the archives.
wanliker@a...
2002-02-26 16:33:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] several items concerning the archives.
J.Critchfield
2002-02-26 16:48:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] several items concerning the archives.
James Owens
2002-02-26 17:30:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: several items concerning the archives.
ron ginger
2002-02-26 18:09:01 UTC
Re: several items concerning the archives.
n4onl
2002-02-26 18:35:04 UTC
Re: several items concerning the archives.
Smoke
2002-02-26 20:55:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: several items concerning the archives.
Jon Elson
2002-02-26 23:37:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] several items concerning the archives.
Jon Elson
2002-02-27 00:01:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] several items concerning the archives.
Engine Tech
2002-02-27 00:28:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] several items concerning the archives.
Engine Tech
2002-02-27 00:40:01 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] several items concerning the archives.
Ian W. Wright
2002-02-27 02:11:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: several items concerning the archives.
michael.hutton@k...
2002-02-27 06:09:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: several items concerning the archives.
Jon Elson
2002-02-27 10:28:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: several items concerning the archives.
Hugh Currin
2002-03-05 11:56:50 UTC
VFD ?
beer@s...
2002-03-05 17:28:53 UTC
Re: VFD ?
Jon Elson
2002-03-05 21:55:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD ?