Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Posted by
wanliker@a...
on 2002-02-26 18:32:38 UTC
In a message dated 2/26/2002 6:09:24 PM Mountain Standard Time, n4ft@...
writes:
you use the credit card method, many will want a little extra to pay for the
PayPal charges. If you use the deduction from your bank account, there are
no extra charges, this is the method I use. Also when we had the No ADS
program before Yahoo, there were over 20 transfers to my PayPal account to
pay for the program, and never heard of any problems. If they come up with a
good No Ads program again, I assume we will use PayPal again to pay for the
program.
bill
List Mom
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
writes:
> I would also like to inquire about anyone's experiences with PayPal. I haveI have now used it in excess of 40 times sending money, with no problems. If
> never used them but read about a problem a while back. I notice that most
> of the vendors mentioned on the list appear to be using PayPal. I am
> interested in ordering a couple of things and am hesitant with something
> new.
>
you use the credit card method, many will want a little extra to pay for the
PayPal charges. If you use the deduction from your bank account, there are
no extra charges, this is the method I use. Also when we had the No ADS
program before Yahoo, there were over 20 transfers to my PayPal account to
pay for the program, and never heard of any problems. If they come up with a
good No Ads program again, I assume we will use PayPal again to pay for the
program.
bill
List Mom
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-02-25 12:34:23 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-02-25 12:53:06 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Guy Sirois
2002-02-25 12:56:03 UTC
RE: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-02-25 13:02:35 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
mariss92705
2002-02-25 15:14:13 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-02-25 17:10:56 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Guy Sirois
2002-02-25 17:26:47 UTC
RE: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
mariss92705
2002-02-25 19:14:09 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-25 22:27:14 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-25 22:30:34 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
mariss92705
2002-02-25 22:45:54 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-25 22:58:24 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
audiomaker2000
2002-02-25 23:17:25 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
the_dutros
2002-02-26 05:58:05 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
rsgoldner
2002-02-26 06:06:55 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
mariss92705
2002-02-26 07:56:17 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-26 09:43:23 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Russ Revels
2002-02-26 17:08:27 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
wanliker@a...
2002-02-26 18:32:38 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Raymond Heckert
2002-02-26 19:48:36 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Daniel J. Statman
2002-02-26 19:52:56 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
cdoughtynz
2002-02-26 20:31:14 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math