Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
Posted by
mariss92705
on 2002-03-10 16:45:34 UTC
Art,
Not to worry. The multipliers were originally designed for point to
point operation; machine stops, change direction, go again.
People started using them for constant contouring.
That required a revision so that each sent step is "tagged" with its
direction. When the step executes, it goes in the direction it was
tagged with. That was done on REV-4, 3 months ago. No more problems.
The next revision will have it tagged 4 steps deep. The only way to
spoof it then will be to change direction 4 times while accelerating.
Not a realistic situation.
Though it was never designed to do constant contouring, with REV-4 it
has been able to, based on reports and extensive testing here.
Because I am paranoid about this, REV-5 will quadruple-nail this
situation shut.
You are taking care of this in software. The REV-4 (current version)
takes care of it in hardware as well.
Mariss
Not to worry. The multipliers were originally designed for point to
point operation; machine stops, change direction, go again.
People started using them for constant contouring.
That required a revision so that each sent step is "tagged" with its
direction. When the step executes, it goes in the direction it was
tagged with. That was done on REV-4, 3 months ago. No more problems.
The next revision will have it tagged 4 steps deep. The only way to
spoof it then will be to change direction 4 times while accelerating.
Not a realistic situation.
Though it was never designed to do constant contouring, with REV-4 it
has been able to, based on reports and extensive testing here.
Because I am paranoid about this, REV-5 will quadruple-nail this
situation shut.
You are taking care of this in software. The REV-4 (current version)
takes care of it in hardware as well.
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Art Fenerty" <fenerty@h...> wrote:
> Surprisingly enough I have had this complaint before. It is usually
the
> step/dir pins being swapped or the polarity is wrong. Gecko's do
indeed need
> special handling of the DIR bit ( Actually, it must be held on as
long as
> the multiplied pulse train) but Master5 takes this into account.
(Couldn't
> have it NOT run Marisses drives..that would be kiss of death).
>
> Try swapping step/dir or polarity and see what happens.
>
> Good luck,
> Art
> Master5 Software
> http://users.andara.com/~fenerty/master.htm
Discussion Thread
ja_erickson
2002-03-10 12:48:39 UTC
INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
mariss92705
2002-03-10 13:10:58 UTC
Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
ja_erickson
2002-03-10 14:14:11 UTC
Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
Robert Allen
2002-03-10 14:34:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
mariss92705
2002-03-10 15:19:08 UTC
Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
Jon Elson
2002-03-10 15:38:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
Art Fenerty
2002-03-10 15:54:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
Bob Campbell
2002-03-10 16:17:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
mariss92705
2002-03-10 16:45:34 UTC
Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
ja_erickson
2002-03-10 17:37:45 UTC
Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
ja_erickson
2002-03-10 17:57:04 UTC
Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
ja_erickson
2002-03-10 17:58:40 UTC
Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
mariss92705
2002-03-10 17:59:25 UTC
Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
mariss92705
2002-03-10 18:06:50 UTC
Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
Hugh Currin
2002-03-10 19:22:00 UTC
Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
destine300@a...
2002-03-10 20:12:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
Jon Elson
2002-03-10 23:10:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION
Jon Elson
2002-03-10 23:13:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] INCONSISTENT STEPPING - WIERD SITUATION