Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How bout this idea??
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-03-13 23:11:17 UTC
"Paul R. Hvidston" wrote:
Jon
> It's been about 10 years since I last did servo stuff, but here's what IAbsolutely!
> recall. By including a velocity tach loop, the system will break static
> friction at the lowest possible error voltage -- less windup and jerk. Also,
> a tach places the motor into a velocity mode -- more predictable. All this
> yields smoother acceleration, better tracking, and the loop is more stable
> than without tach feedback.
Jon
Discussion Thread
sspeed33317
2002-03-13 16:20:50 UTC
How bout this idea??
Doug Fortune
2002-03-13 17:24:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] How bout this idea??
JanRwl@A...
2002-03-13 19:58:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] How bout this idea??
deanc500
2002-03-13 20:04:23 UTC
Re: How bout this idea??
sspeed33317
2002-03-13 20:26:38 UTC
Re: How bout this idea??
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-03-13 20:45:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How bout this idea??
deanc500
2002-03-13 20:53:12 UTC
Re: How bout this idea??
wanliker@a...
2002-03-13 20:55:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How bout this idea??
Tim Goldstein
2002-03-13 21:18:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] How bout this idea??
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-03-13 21:44:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How bout this idea??
Doug Fortune
2002-03-13 22:01:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How bout this idea??
Jon Elson
2002-03-13 23:11:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How bout this idea??
Jon Elson
2002-03-13 23:22:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How bout this idea??
Brian
2002-03-14 16:53:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How bout this idea??