Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stable EMC version?
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-05-19 23:39:51 UTC
patrick@... wrote:
approximately that date. I have tried a few of the later versions with enough
problems to have to go back. Some time quite a bit later, the RT patch
was upgraded with a new kernel, and it has fixed a lot of the problems,
I believe. I am working with one of the latest BDI CDs, and intend to
upgrade everything at once, when I get my new hardware and drivers
working with the new EMC and Linux kernel.
Well, I think experience with the computer, Linux RT-kernel, EMC version,
GUI and Xwindows server, etc. is the only way to be sure. You can
leave EMC running overnight or all day, and see if anything goes
haywire.
Jon
> A couple of different conversations I've had in the past week have caused me toI have been running the 20-Dec-1999 EMC on my milling machine since
> wonder which version of EMC is being used by list members who are actually
> running jobs on their machines. In other words, what is the most reliable and
> stable version of EMC currently available?
> After being a quasi-bystander for the last couple of years, I finally have EMC
> driving my Emco-Maier f1 milling machine. I am currently running the BDI
> version of EMC, but I need to be certain that I can count on whatever version I
> am running. I know that both Jon and Tim have been longtime user's of EMC, and
> if I'm not mistaken, both are running earlier(?) versions of EMC. I am
> definitely interested in hearing any opinions on this.
>
> ftr: I am using a pentium 233, driving Gecko 320's, and servos
approximately that date. I have tried a few of the later versions with enough
problems to have to go back. Some time quite a bit later, the RT patch
was upgraded with a new kernel, and it has fixed a lot of the problems,
I believe. I am working with one of the latest BDI CDs, and intend to
upgrade everything at once, when I get my new hardware and drivers
working with the new EMC and Linux kernel.
Well, I think experience with the computer, Linux RT-kernel, EMC version,
GUI and Xwindows server, etc. is the only way to be sure. You can
leave EMC running overnight or all day, and see if anything goes
haywire.
Jon
Discussion Thread
patrick@h...
2002-05-19 13:02:03 UTC
stable EMC version?
Tim Goldstein
2002-05-19 13:22:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stable EMC version?
Jon Elson
2002-05-19 23:39:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stable EMC version?
stevenson_engineers
2002-05-20 02:39:47 UTC
Re: stable EMC version?
Tim Goldstein
2002-05-20 08:41:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Jon Elson
2002-05-20 09:36:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Jon Elson
2002-05-20 09:45:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
j.guenther
2002-05-20 10:10:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Tim Goldstein
2002-05-20 12:00:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Les Watts
2002-05-20 15:25:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
John Guenther
2002-05-20 16:23:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Les Watts
2002-05-20 16:37:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Matt Shaver
2002-05-20 18:07:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?