CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?

Posted by John Guenther
on 2002-05-20 16:23:55 UTC
Yes, ignoring perfectly good commands and continuing on is not good. I have
been told that this is a known bug with the G02/G03 commands. The
interesting problem is that with some combinations of I and J it works and
with others it does not. The lines I provided are part of a rather long
program to cut fan holes in the front panel of my driver box. I can provide
you with the complete file if you want it.

John Guenther
Sterling, Virginia

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Les Watts [mailto:leswatts@...]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 18:30
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
>
>
> I have not seen such problems yet, but I realize I might.
> I am using 2.14+ with the Servo to Go II homing bug fixed.
> I have seen no other problems so far... but then I have just
> started running and am mostly cutting air.
>
> I would like to see a current bug list for EMC- particularly the RS274
> parser.
> Let's find em and fix em! This one sounds like a syntax thing. If
> the parser
> does not like the syntax it should spit out an error message even if the
> syntax is ok and emc has the bug. Ignoring perfectly good commands
> but continueing program execution is a bad thing!!
>
> I am willing to try any reported RS274 improper command execution on
> my machine as it is up and running with EMC closed loop servo. I will try
> the
> one mentioned in MDI mode as soon as I can.
>
> Les
>
> Leslie Watts
> L M Watts Furniture
> Tiger, Georgia USA
> http://www.rabun.net/~leswatts/wattsfurniturewp.html
> engineering page:
> http://www.rabun.net/~leswatts/shop.html
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "j.guenther" <j.guenther@...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 1:10 PM
> Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
>
>
> > My main problem with BDI 2-12 is that certain combinations of parameters
> for
> > the G02/G03 commands cause the command to be totally ignored.
> >
> > For example
> > G02 X 3.3125 Y 1.5000 I-1.0000 J 0.0000 F 2.50
> > did not work with BDI 2.12 but
> > G02 X 29.7625 Y 0.000000 I-29.7625 J 0.000000 F 2.50
> > did work. The last example is metric dimensions.
> >
> > However both of these commands work with TurboCNC.
> >
> > John Guenther
> > Sterling, Virginia
> >
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
> as a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members
> are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
>
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Discussion Thread

patrick@h... 2002-05-19 13:02:03 UTC stable EMC version? Tim Goldstein 2002-05-19 13:22:37 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stable EMC version? Jon Elson 2002-05-19 23:39:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stable EMC version? stevenson_engineers 2002-05-20 02:39:47 UTC Re: stable EMC version? Tim Goldstein 2002-05-20 08:41:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version? Jon Elson 2002-05-20 09:36:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version? Jon Elson 2002-05-20 09:45:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version? j.guenther 2002-05-20 10:10:20 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version? Tim Goldstein 2002-05-20 12:00:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version? Les Watts 2002-05-20 15:25:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version? John Guenther 2002-05-20 16:23:55 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version? Les Watts 2002-05-20 16:37:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version? Matt Shaver 2002-05-20 18:07:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?