Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Posted by
Les Watts
on 2002-05-20 15:25:45 UTC
I have not seen such problems yet, but I realize I might.
I am using 2.14+ with the Servo to Go II homing bug fixed.
I have seen no other problems so far... but then I have just
started running and am mostly cutting air.
I would like to see a current bug list for EMC- particularly the RS274
parser.
Let's find em and fix em! This one sounds like a syntax thing. If the parser
does not like the syntax it should spit out an error message even if the
syntax is ok and emc has the bug. Ignoring perfectly good commands
but continueing program execution is a bad thing!!
I am willing to try any reported RS274 improper command execution on
my machine as it is up and running with EMC closed loop servo. I will try
the
one mentioned in MDI mode as soon as I can.
Les
Leslie Watts
L M Watts Furniture
Tiger, Georgia USA
http://www.rabun.net/~leswatts/wattsfurniturewp.html
engineering page:
http://www.rabun.net/~leswatts/shop.html
I am using 2.14+ with the Servo to Go II homing bug fixed.
I have seen no other problems so far... but then I have just
started running and am mostly cutting air.
I would like to see a current bug list for EMC- particularly the RS274
parser.
Let's find em and fix em! This one sounds like a syntax thing. If the parser
does not like the syntax it should spit out an error message even if the
syntax is ok and emc has the bug. Ignoring perfectly good commands
but continueing program execution is a bad thing!!
I am willing to try any reported RS274 improper command execution on
my machine as it is up and running with EMC closed loop servo. I will try
the
one mentioned in MDI mode as soon as I can.
Les
Leslie Watts
L M Watts Furniture
Tiger, Georgia USA
http://www.rabun.net/~leswatts/wattsfurniturewp.html
engineering page:
http://www.rabun.net/~leswatts/shop.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "j.guenther" <j.guenther@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 1:10 PM
Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
> My main problem with BDI 2-12 is that certain combinations of parameters
for
> the G02/G03 commands cause the command to be totally ignored.
>
> For example
> G02 X 3.3125 Y 1.5000 I-1.0000 J 0.0000 F 2.50
> did not work with BDI 2.12 but
> G02 X 29.7625 Y 0.000000 I-29.7625 J 0.000000 F 2.50
> did work. The last example is metric dimensions.
>
> However both of these commands work with TurboCNC.
>
> John Guenther
> Sterling, Virginia
>
Discussion Thread
patrick@h...
2002-05-19 13:02:03 UTC
stable EMC version?
Tim Goldstein
2002-05-19 13:22:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stable EMC version?
Jon Elson
2002-05-19 23:39:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stable EMC version?
stevenson_engineers
2002-05-20 02:39:47 UTC
Re: stable EMC version?
Tim Goldstein
2002-05-20 08:41:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Jon Elson
2002-05-20 09:36:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Jon Elson
2002-05-20 09:45:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
j.guenther
2002-05-20 10:10:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Tim Goldstein
2002-05-20 12:00:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Les Watts
2002-05-20 15:25:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
John Guenther
2002-05-20 16:23:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Les Watts
2002-05-20 16:37:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?
Matt Shaver
2002-05-20 18:07:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stable EMC version?