Re: acceleration profille
Posted by
jmkasunich
on 2002-07-27 17:02:37 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Graham Hollis" <ghollis@m...> wrote:
windows, and _IF_ the mail servers don't strip it out, it
prints a nice superscript 2. What if I want to raise a
number to the 3.2 power? What if I'm not running windows?
"steps/sec^2" is understandable on just about any computer
running any OS. The windows ALT+0178 may look nicer on
_some_ computers, but is totally meaningless on others.
John
> > > I believe the correct units for acceleration is 1000 stepsThis is exactly what I was complaining about. _IF_ you run
> > > per sec. per sec or 1000steps/sec. squared. It is really
> > > hard to represend the (sec. power of 2) When is some genius
> > > programmer going to allow us to do that over the net?
> >
> > use "steps/sec^2"
> >
> > We don't need (or want) some "genius" programmer coming up
> > with some non-compatible special characters. The caret
> > ("^") is _almost_ universally accepted as the indicator
> > for raising a number to a power in the computing world.
> >
> > John Kasunich
> >
>
> If you run windows the genius programmers have already
> been hard at work. Just hold down the ALT key and type
> 0178 on the *numeric* key pad. If the mail servers don't
> strip it out, ALT+0178 should produce:
>
> steps/secĀ²
>
> Graham
windows, and _IF_ the mail servers don't strip it out, it
prints a nice superscript 2. What if I want to raise a
number to the 3.2 power? What if I'm not running windows?
"steps/sec^2" is understandable on just about any computer
running any OS. The windows ALT+0178 may look nicer on
_some_ computers, but is totally meaningless on others.
John
Discussion Thread
keongsan
2002-07-26 02:01:35 UTC
acceleration profille
Dan Mauch
2002-07-26 11:19:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] acceleration profille
Dave Hylands
2002-07-26 11:31:42 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] acceleration profille
cadcambee
2002-07-26 17:21:48 UTC
Re: acceleration profille
keongsan
2002-07-27 05:04:39 UTC
Re: acceleration profille (gained steps?)
jmkasunich
2002-07-27 12:26:06 UTC
Re: acceleration profille
Graham Hollis
2002-07-27 15:05:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: acceleration profille
Michael Holm
2002-07-27 16:49:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] acceleration profille
jmkasunich
2002-07-27 17:02:37 UTC
Re: acceleration profille
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-07-27 17:30:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] acceleration profille
cadcambee
2002-07-27 18:08:52 UTC
Re: acceleration profille
mariss92705
2002-07-27 19:52:51 UTC
Re: acceleration profille
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-07-28 11:26:47 UTC
Re: acceleration profille
keongsan
2002-07-28 16:57:15 UTC
Re: acceleration profille (gained steps?)
keongsan
2002-07-28 17:01:16 UTC
Re: acceleration profille (gained steps?)
Steve Blackmore
2002-07-28 17:34:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: acceleration profille
Dave Hylands
2002-07-28 18:00:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: acceleration profille (gained steps?)
mariss92705
2002-07-28 18:20:29 UTC
Re: acceleration profille (gained steps?)
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-07-28 19:57:30 UTC
Re: acceleration profille
MIKEC@W...
2002-07-28 21:41:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: acceleration profille
MIKEC@W...
2002-07-28 21:44:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] acceleration profille
chapmani
2002-07-29 02:11:59 UTC
Re: acceleration profille
eforum3001
2002-07-29 04:04:01 UTC
Re: acceleration profille (gained steps?)