Re: boom
Posted by
mayfieldtm
on 2002-08-05 23:05:54 UTC
Splendid explanation!
Haven't used those formulas sense the Vacuum Tube Days.
Used to use the collapsing current of D.C. relay coils by
recirculating the current through a diode (effectively shorting out
the relay). The relay would hold closed several seconds before
dropping out. This simple and cheap delay trick proved handy in many
applications.
Thanks
Tom M.
Haven't used those formulas sense the Vacuum Tube Days.
Used to use the collapsing current of D.C. relay coils by
recirculating the current through a diode (effectively shorting out
the relay). The relay would hold closed several seconds before
dropping out. This simple and cheap delay trick proved handy in many
applications.
Thanks
Tom M.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Bevan Weiss" <kaizen__@h...> wrote:
> Keeping in mind that you can express the back emf caused by a
collapsing (or
> building) magnetic field as
> EMF = -L*di/dt;
>
> This means that the voltage produced (EMF) will always oppose the
change in
> current. Whether the current is increasing or decreasing. The
only real
> time that we have to worry about this however is when energy is
stored in
> the magnetic field of the inductor (aka winding). The energy
stored in
> magnetic field of the inductor will be
> E = 1/2*L*I^2;
>
> Thus when the magnetic field is made to collapse, via disconnecting
the
> current source (either mechanically via switch or electrically via
> transistor) the energy will be expended in trying to keep the
current
> flowing, this will cause a large voltage to be produced which will
be
> proportional to the rate at which the current was reduced.
> Generally a transistor will cause the current to reduce more
gradually than
> a simple switch will, although the switch will also bounce more and
thus
> take a longer time to finally settle in the off condition.
>
> In either case the driving circuitry should be protected from the
emf (to a
> certain extent) by the proper use of a snubbing circuit.
Disconnecting the
> windings whilst current is flowing through them (in either the hold
state,
> or whilst moving) is not a good idea, although I'm sure we're
already
> decided on this. The electrical switching (via transistor) should
be done
> in such a way that the the reverse voltage produced by the winding
is
> lessened, and wont cause damage to the driving or switching
circuitry.
Discussion Thread
tauscnc
2002-08-03 21:01:34 UTC
L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
afogassa
2002-08-03 21:18:57 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
RichD
2002-08-03 21:19:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-08-03 22:02:40 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
tauscnc
2002-08-03 22:05:32 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
RichD
2002-08-03 22:21:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
tauscnc
2002-08-03 22:41:37 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-08-03 23:10:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
tauscnc
2002-08-03 23:25:40 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
alenz2002
2002-08-03 23:59:12 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
bjammin@i...
2002-08-04 05:16:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
RichD
2002-08-04 07:57:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
tauscnc
2002-08-04 08:08:09 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
bjammin@i...
2002-08-04 08:39:46 UTC
L298 goes boom
exeric1
2002-08-04 08:45:23 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
exeric1
2002-08-04 09:09:31 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom
tauscnc
2002-08-04 09:53:57 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom
mayfieldtm
2002-08-04 10:22:36 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom
RichD
2002-08-04 12:25:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L298 goes boom
tauscnc
2002-08-04 12:49:53 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-08-04 14:49:46 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-08-04 15:17:14 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
turbulatordude
2002-08-04 15:20:27 UTC
Novice question about - Re: L298 goes boom
studleylee
2002-08-04 16:37:48 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-08-04 16:50:24 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom
studleylee
2002-08-04 17:29:10 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-08-05 10:55:57 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom
bjammin@i...
2002-08-05 12:39:57 UTC
boom
mayfieldtm
2002-08-05 12:53:15 UTC
Re: boom
Bevan Weiss
2002-08-05 18:10:17 UTC
re: boom
tauscnc
2002-08-05 18:41:05 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom - AWO?
mayfieldtm
2002-08-05 23:05:54 UTC
Re: boom
bjammin@i...
2002-08-06 03:57:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: boom
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-08-06 05:46:35 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: boom
mayfieldtm
2002-08-06 08:44:56 UTC
Re: boom
kooloosj
2002-08-07 02:10:28 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
Ian W. Wright
2002-08-07 10:25:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L298 goes boom on my camtronics :(
tauscnc
2002-08-08 18:48:21 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )
afogassa
2002-08-08 20:51:42 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )
Dave Hylands
2002-08-08 20:57:06 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )
tauscnc
2002-08-08 21:06:06 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )
tauscnc
2002-08-08 21:10:41 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )
jeffgnu
2002-08-08 21:42:45 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )
RichD
2002-08-08 21:51:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )
RichD
2002-08-08 21:55:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )
jeffgnu
2002-08-08 22:33:46 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )
Ian W. Wright
2002-08-09 00:59:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )
cadcambee
2002-08-09 01:10:02 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )
caudlet
2002-08-09 08:00:15 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )
cadcambee
2002-08-09 11:51:28 UTC
Re: L298 goes boom (AWO)
JJ
2002-08-11 11:37:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L298 goes boom ( It's Fixed!- Yeah! )