Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-11-07 09:14:59 UTC
Mark Taft wrote:
several projects. They take care
of the level shifting required to drive a high-side FET (or IGBT) in
bridge type drivers. You can get
them from Newark or Digi-Key in single quantity. These drivers and FETs
of the IRF640 series
can make a very cheap, high power driver.
Jon
>HI everyone,I used the International Rectifier IR2110 and IR2113 FET drivers in
>
>I have recently designed a new board based on the L297,L278.
>
>At present its still on the drawing board, ( to be made and tested)
>
>If it works ok it will run 80 volts at 30 amps or more.
>
>In my search for ideas I found one person who had interfaced the L297 to a
>special Signetics driver capable of running at 600Volts at 50 amps.
>This apparently is a commercial design.
>
>I failed to follow this route as the driver chips are only available in
>large quantities, so I used Fets instead.
>
>Once we have one running successfully the plan is to publish the circuit so
>anyone can use it.
>
>
several projects. They take care
of the level shifting required to drive a high-side FET (or IGBT) in
bridge type drivers. You can get
them from Newark or Digi-Key in single quantity. These drivers and FETs
of the IRF640 series
can make a very cheap, high power driver.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Tony Jeffree
2002-11-07 00:53:04 UTC
Higher power from L298 etc.
Van Der Sandt Coert
2002-11-07 01:59:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Higher power from L298 etc.
Tony Jeffree
2002-11-07 02:18:11 UTC
Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Van Der Sandt Coert
2002-11-07 02:25:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Tony Jeffree
2002-11-07 02:51:10 UTC
Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Tony Jeffree
2002-11-07 02:54:45 UTC
Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Mark Taft
2002-11-07 03:27:04 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Van Der Sandt Coert
2002-11-07 04:21:50 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Jon Elson
2002-11-07 09:14:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-07 12:58:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Tony Jeffree
2002-11-07 19:31:14 UTC
Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Tony Jeffree
2002-11-07 19:32:06 UTC
Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
mariss92705
2002-11-07 20:33:30 UTC
Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Tony Jeffree
2002-11-08 00:16:20 UTC
Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
JJ
2002-11-08 05:03:34 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Van Der Sandt Coert
2002-11-08 06:04:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
Ron Kline
2002-11-08 06:48:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
petegrk@m...
2002-11-08 19:52:58 UTC
Master CAM cost
Mr.G
2002-11-08 20:47:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Master CAM cost
dgmachinist
2002-11-11 01:59:43 UTC
Re: Master CAM cost
petegrk@m...
2002-11-14 07:35:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Master CAM cost