RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.

As someone pointed out to me (forgot who, sorry), the L6203 has a higher
current rating than the L298. You also use 2 per axis. Total current per
device is 4A. They also don't require schottky diodes on the outputs.
Cost would be about US$15 per axis for the L6203s.

http://us.st.com/stonline/books/pdf/docs/1373.pdf

Regards,
JJ

Be Kind, Be Careful, Be Yourself

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Van Der Sandt Coert [mailto:vandersandtc@...]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 7:20 AM
> To: 'CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com'
> Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
>
>
> No problem, I will check the boards and try to do a circuit
> layout. Better
> yet, I will take some pics and post them tomorrow.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Jeffree [mailto:tony@...]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 12:55 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
>
>
> Apologies - disregard that comment - just spotted that you said 4
> L298's - the SGS Thompson config was 2 L298's. So they may well be
> right about 4A/phase. Apologies for the confusion. Presumably they
> are using 4 drivers in paralell for each phase. Interesting!
>
> Regards,
> Tony.
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Van Der Sandt Coert <vandersandtc@a...>
> wrote:
> > Oh OK - I suppose that the cards are over spec'd then. Good to know
> for
> > future ref.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Coert
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tony Jeffree [mailto:tony@j...]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 12:18 PM
> > To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
> > Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher power from L298 etc.
> >
> >
> > Yes, the SGS Thompson datasheet shows such a configuration;
> however,
> > they indicate a max of 3A (not 4A) DC and 3.5A repetitive (80:20
> duty
> > cycle with n on time of 10ms) for that configuration. So it sounds
> to
> > me like the boards you have are a touch over spec'd according to
> the
> > words in the SGS Thompson datasheet.
> >
> > Operating the drivers independently, the datasheet indicates
> 2A/phase
> > DC and 2.5A/phase repetitive. So by using an extra 297 to allow all
> 4
> > drivers to be current limited independently, it seems to me that
> you
> > could end up with 4A/phase DC and 5A/phase repetetive.
> >
> > Anyone know of/tried such a configuration?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tony
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Van Der Sandt Coert
> <vandersandtc@a...>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Tony
> > > I have four controllers (Avistep) that I bought surplus. Each
> > controller has
> > > four 298's and only one 297. Claimed current per phase is 4A. I
> > could never
> > > test this as none of my setups is that power hungry. My point is
> > that it is
> > > possible to get 4A / phase with 4 298 and one 297. Unfortunately
> I
> > do not
> > > have the circuit diagrams for the controllers only the physical
> > controllers.
> > >
> > > BTW : Has anyone ever heard of Avistep controllers? Net searches
> > don't seem
> > > to be able to find any references to these controllers.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Coert
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tony Jeffree [mailto:tony@j...]
> > >
> > >
> > > I was musing about the problem of getting better than 2A/phase
> out
> > of
> > > L298s (or better than 2.5A/phase out of Allegro 3977s). The
> > datasheet
> > > for the L298 suggests that it is possible to use 2 L298s, and
> > deliver
> > > 3A/phase, by paralelling the two driver stages in one 298 to
> drive
> > > one motor coil, and paralelling the other driver stages to drive
> > the
> > > second coil. Presumably, you can't get the full 4A/phase when
> doing
> > > this because of imperfect matching of the driver characteristics,
> > > which would cause one driver to take more of the current, and the
> > > current sense operates on the sum of the currents through each
> > > driver, leading to the danger of thermal runaway & release of the
> > > magic black smoke.
> > >
> > > It occurred to me that there is an alternative approach that
> could
> > > work with 8-wire motors; instead of wiring the L298 outputs in
> > > paralell, you use one half of a 298 to drive the A coil, and the
> > > other to drive the B coil; similarly, use one half of the second
> > 298
> > > to drive the A' coil, and the other half to drive the B' coil.
> > > Unfortunately, you would have to double up on L297's as well, in
> > > order to control all four coils independently; the step-and-
> > direction
> > > signals into these would simply be wired in paralell.
> > >
> > > All four drivers should then be able to operate up to their full
> > > 2A/phase, as they would be generating their own independent
> current
> > > sense signals back to their respective 297s. In effect, you would
> > > then have the same result as driving the 8-wire motor in bipolar
> > > paralell configuration, and would set the current limit on the
> > > drivers to 1/2 the value you would normally use for bipolar
> > paralell.
> > >
> > > Presumably this same approach could also be used with other
> driver
> > > chipsets such as the Allegro 3977, etc.
> > >
> > > So this would seem allow driving up to 4A/phase into 8-wire
> motors
> > > using two sets of 297/298, or 5A/phase using two 3977s.
> > >
> > > Can anyone see a problem with this approach (other than the cost
> of
> > > an extra chipset & ancilliary components per motor, and the
> > > limitation of using 8-wire motors)?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Confidentiality Warning
> > > =======================
> > > The contents of this e-mail and any accompanying documentation
> > > are confidential and any use thereof, in what ever form, by anyone
> > > other than the addressee is strictly prohibited.
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@y...
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@y...
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@y..., wanliker@a...
> > Moderator: jmelson@a... timg@k... [Moderator]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> > aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> reach it if
> > you have trouble.
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to
> be a
> > sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
> there, for OT
> > subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING
> THEM.
> > DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@...
> [Moderator]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com
> to reach it if
> you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider
> this to be a
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members
> are there, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> POSTING THEM.
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ:
> http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@...
> [Moderator]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com
> to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there,
for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/