CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] It's ALIVE!!!

Posted by Tim Goldstein
on 2002-11-30 14:23:42 UTC
Reducing the amperage will only derate your holding torque that you
already have more than enough of. It will not affect your running torque
once you hit the point where the motor inductance is the the actually
current limit. So, by reducing your amperage below what the max is for
your setup you will not affect your rapid feeds at all.

What Dan is telling you is that the rating given on a motor is usually
for unipolar (half coil) and that if you connect as bipolar series you
need to drop the current. If you look at the Powermax II ratings you
will see there list different current levels for unipolar, bipolar
series, and bipolar parallel for the same motor. They all take different
amounts of current. My above statement is explaining why running below
the max current for the configuration normally does not affect you at
all.

Tim
[Denver CO]
Sherline Products at Deep Discount
Mach1 & DeskCNC with Credit Card ordering
Contact me for discounts on DeskCNC & Sherline bundles
www.KTMarketing.com/Sherline

> -----Original Message-----
> Dan,
>
> Could you enlighten me on why we would derate the amps by
> 71.5%. I am in the middle of setting up a sherline mill with
> a set of PowerMax II steppers with a series rating of 2.8A.
> According to your statement, I should be running them at ~2A.
> Wouldn't this reduce the torque by ~28% also?
>
> George

Discussion Thread

barclaygeo 2002-11-29 18:54:55 UTC It's ALIVE!!! Tim Goldstein 2002-11-29 19:54:32 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] It's ALIVE!!! barclaygeo 2002-11-29 20:20:13 UTC Re: It's ALIVE!!! barclaygeo 2002-11-29 20:21:33 UTC Re: It's ALIVE!!! Tim Goldstein 2002-11-29 20:26:51 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: It's ALIVE!!! Dan Mauch 2002-11-30 08:07:40 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] It's ALIVE!!! George Erhart 2002-11-30 14:12:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] It's ALIVE!!! Tim Goldstein 2002-11-30 14:23:42 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] It's ALIVE!!! Fusion X Studio 2002-11-30 16:07:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: It's ALIVE!!! Dan Mauch 2002-12-01 08:19:00 UTC The ultimate shop PC sytem JanRwl@A... 2002-12-01 19:31:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The ultimate shop PC sytem Dan Mauch 2002-12-02 06:28:33 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The ultimate shop PC sytem CL 2002-12-02 13:25:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mach1 -> Fully released. (Finally) JanRwl@A... 2002-12-02 14:33:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The ultimate shop PC sytem Askew, Jason 2002-12-02 14:37:50 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The ultimate shop PC sytem Marv Frankel 2002-12-02 15:04:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The ultimate shop PC sytem n4onl 2002-12-02 15:31:01 UTC Re: The ultimate shop PC sytem Art 2002-12-02 16:49:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: The ultimate shop PC sytem JanRwl@A... 2002-12-02 17:28:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The ultimate shop PC sytem JanRwl@A... 2002-12-02 17:53:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: The ultimate shop PC sytem Paul Amaranth 2002-12-02 18:46:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: The ultimate shop PC sytem Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-12-02 19:24:48 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: The ultimate shop PC sytem echnidna 2002-12-02 19:38:42 UTC Re: The ultimate shop PC sytem Marv Frankel 2002-12-02 19:56:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: The ultimate shop PC sytem JanRwl@A... 2002-12-02 22:28:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: The ultimate shop PC sytem JanRwl@A... 2002-12-02 22:30:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: The ultimate shop PC sytem JanRwl@A... 2002-12-02 22:34:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: The ultimate shop PC sytem Dan Mauch 2002-12-03 06:27:11 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The ultimate shop PC sytem dserratt2001 <dserratt@n... 2002-12-09 07:45:05 UTC Re: The ultimate shop PC sytem Dan Mauch 2002-12-09 09:05:35 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: The ultimate shop PC sytem