Re: Plasma cnc
Posted by
jcc3inc <jccinc@o...
on 2003-01-19 06:35:03 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Tyson S."
<timbercutter@y...> wrote:
Thre most prqactical approach to longer travel for either a plasma or
router machine is rack and pinion. C & G Systems is a company I
started a number of years ago. We made plasma and oxyfuel cutting
machines and ALL of them were rack and pinion drives. You can buy
gear rack, 1/2 x 1/2 with 20 degree pressure angle and the drive
pinions to match. Combining rack end-to-end allows any length.
Rack and pinion has minimum backlash as you commonly preload the
pinion into the rack with a spring arrangement. All plasma machines
which I know of do this.
It is common to have dual side drive for larger machines (wider than
6 feet),but you should seriously consider single side drive with the
master rail having the guide wheels widely spaced and preloaded for
rigidity to do single side drive. Do a little calculating and
testing to see what deflections you get with a given load (in the
case of a router). With plasma you have no resistance to overcome
except for the F = M x A component. If you use steppers, it is
easier to achieve synchronization with dual side drives, but for
servos, we used a synchronizer setup consisting of resolvers with a
1000~ carrier and demodulator to provide a sync signal to the slave
side. Of course that is more involved!
While most of the people on this site use ballscrews for drive means,
I think they are overlooking a very viable alternative in rack and
pinion usage.
Jack C. Cain
<timbercutter@y...> wrote:
> Yeah, the Hypertherm Powermax 1250 is top of the lineDear Sir:
> for CNC plasma operations. It allready has the remote
> torch on/off terminal installed for the G-Code to run
> the torch. But at $3500 I say ouch. I am also drawing
> up plans for a combo plasma/router cnc machine and am
> looking at drive options. The ball screws for an
> 5'X10' table run in the thousands of dollars. I was
> wondering if anyone here has ever seen,used,heard of
> chain and sprockets instead of screws? My parents have
> a picture framing shop and they use a CNC mat cutter.
> I was looking at the gantry rails to see what kind of
> drive system was there and it's all small chain and
> sprockets. a littls smaller than a bicycle chain would
Thre most prqactical approach to longer travel for either a plasma or
router machine is rack and pinion. C & G Systems is a company I
started a number of years ago. We made plasma and oxyfuel cutting
machines and ALL of them were rack and pinion drives. You can buy
gear rack, 1/2 x 1/2 with 20 degree pressure angle and the drive
pinions to match. Combining rack end-to-end allows any length.
Rack and pinion has minimum backlash as you commonly preload the
pinion into the rack with a spring arrangement. All plasma machines
which I know of do this.
It is common to have dual side drive for larger machines (wider than
6 feet),but you should seriously consider single side drive with the
master rail having the guide wheels widely spaced and preloaded for
rigidity to do single side drive. Do a little calculating and
testing to see what deflections you get with a given load (in the
case of a router). With plasma you have no resistance to overcome
except for the F = M x A component. If you use steppers, it is
easier to achieve synchronization with dual side drives, but for
servos, we used a synchronizer setup consisting of resolvers with a
1000~ carrier and demodulator to provide a sync signal to the slave
side. Of course that is more involved!
While most of the people on this site use ballscrews for drive means,
I think they are overlooking a very viable alternative in rack and
pinion usage.
Jack C. Cain
Discussion Thread
afogassa <afogassa@y...
2003-01-18 05:42:47 UTC
Plasma cnc
Jens Swales <jipeess2000@y...
2003-01-18 08:34:09 UTC
Re: Plasma cnc
Tyson S.
2003-01-18 10:18:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma cnc
Peter
2003-01-18 10:22:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Plasma cnc
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-01-18 10:56:52 UTC
Re: Plasma cnc
Les Newell
2003-01-18 12:08:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma cnc
Jens Swales <jipeess2000@y...
2003-01-18 12:17:33 UTC
Re: Plasma cnc
Chris Ramirez
2003-01-18 16:31:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma cnc
zestronad54529 <dpeter@n...
2003-01-18 17:01:48 UTC
Re: Plasma cnc
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-18 23:22:52 UTC
polygon effect, and chain use in CNC was Re: Plasma cnc
Jens Swales <jipeess2000@y...
2003-01-19 02:03:53 UTC
polygon effect, and chain use in CNC was Re: Plasma cnc
Les Newell
2003-01-19 02:18:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma cnc
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-19 02:32:56 UTC
offlist CCED reply
jcc3inc <jccinc@o...
2003-01-19 06:35:03 UTC
Re: Plasma cnc
wanliker@a...
2003-01-19 06:51:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] offlist CCED reply
Tyson S.
2003-01-20 19:37:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma cnc
zestronad54529 <dpeter@n...
2003-01-20 20:17:59 UTC
Re: Plasma cnc
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-01-21 08:59:14 UTC
Re: Plasma cnc
ftomazz <filipetomaz@p...
2003-01-21 13:18:15 UTC
Re: Plasma cnc